Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fournette


Shocker

Recommended Posts

Can we discuss this guy...interested in posters views.  Personally, I cannot even fathom passing on him, but still he is a RB and injuries are a concern.  We have other needs that are probably more important as well.  I also like Christian McCafferry and his running style (esp if we keep Stew).  Not sure 100% on whether we should use 8 on him.  Should we pass on him if avail and go pass rusher\move down\other need?

Thoughts bitoches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Can we discuss this guy...interested in posters views.  Personally, I cannot even fathom passing on him, but still he is a RB and injuries are a concern.  We have other needs that are probably more important as well.  I also like Christian McCafferry and his running style (esp if we keep Stew).  Not sure 100% on whether we should use 8 on him.  Should we pass on him if avail and go pass rusher\move down\other need?

Thoughts bitoches.

There's no Fornette in this draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as injuries go he will not have as many touches in the NFL he was way over used they literally jump on his back and carried that team and they still couldn't stop him. Now last season was not as impressive as his last cause he was play hurt all year.
I think he is a player you have to fight to get even if that means trading up to get we have the picks to do it and still have plenty of picks left or shift a mid round pick next year. If the cb drops to the jets I think they will go defense.
What would it take to trade to the 2nd or 3rd spot?


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...