Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Both ints not jakes fault


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

I am a hardcore Jake fan but that first int was his fault. Even though Moose could have made a play at the ball, he would have been saving Jake from making a bad throw. It was underthrown into double coverage. Bad decision.

You're ignorant. The Panthers always underthrow the deep ball and have the receiver stop for it. The fact that it was underthrown enough where the SECOND DEFENDER was out of the play and it was left up to Moose and the guy who intercepted it to fight for it, means that it was in fact a good throw, Moose just DIDN'T TRY TO CATCH IT so the other defender came up with it, retard.

Because it was intercepted, you assume it was a bad throw. Had Muhammad actually tried to catch it, he would have, then ignorant people like you wouldn't be criticizing it, because all people like you can see is the final result...CATCH OR INTERCEPTION.

You don't see the design.

It was intentionally underthrown to make it one on one instead of one on two...DUH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're ignorant. The Panthers always underthrow the deep ball and have the receiver stop for it. The fact that it was underthrown enough where the SECOND DEFENDER was out of the play and it was left up to Moose and the guy who intercepted it to fight for it, means that it was in fact a good throw, Moose just DIDN'T TRY TO CATCH IT so the other defender came up with it, retard.

Because it was intercepted, you assume it was a bad throw. Had Muhammad actually tried to catch it, he would have, then ignorant people like you wouldn't be criticizing it, because all people like you can see is the final result...CATCH OR INTERCEPTION.

You don't see the design.

It was intentionally underthrown to make it one on one instead of one on two...DUH.

Underthrown into double coverage = dumb f**king play by a dumbass QB.

Think twice before you call someone ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you'd think the panthers would value a QB with a strong arm for a vertical passing offense, or at least an accurate one. It's obvious Jake's age has caught up with him and his tommy john not enough to give him the arm strength required to throw in this offense.

A lot of his completions were short throws, throws to the running back, WR screens, etc. Once he had to throw long he looked good, then bad, then good, then bad, in other words he was inconsistent.

The first one was obviously underthrown, and anybody knows in your normal go route the WR shouldn't have to turn around and fair catch the ball, you should hit them in stride, and a better, more accurate QB could've got it to Moose.

the second one I won't place the blame solely on Jake but it looks like he and Smith weren't on the same page and nevertheless he is partly responsible.

the fumble was basically Jake not securing the ball like always. So in any event he was responsible for more than two turnovers tonight, not what I'd call protecting the rock in an offense that values ball control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i love how people come here, after every single game, after every single loss, and haplessly lobby for Jake and make excuses and defer most/all of the blame off him for his mistakes, which includes breaking down the plays with their expert analysis of 1/2 sentences to tell us why it's the receivers' fault.

Even if you cut his turnovers in half to put on him he's still not doing a good job of protecting the ball at all. And the official NFL statistics say 9 in 3 games.

you look like fools

Similar to all of the Jake haters who come on here game after game and try to lay everything bad that happened on his shoulders.

The first pass was 75% Jake and 25% Moose. Alot of teams (including the Panthers) throw that pass short....allowing the offensive player to go up and get it. However, it floated too much. Then, Moose made a terrible effort to make a play on it.

The second WAS NOT Jake's fault. A quick slant pass is all about timing. The ball actually has to come out of the QB's hands before the WR even breaks on his route. Smitty was at fault 100% on that play. He hung Jake out to dry on that route and it never had a chance.

Jake is not playing well this season, there is no doubt about this. But, stop trying to blame every bad play on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do blame Jake for the first INT. It was a poor throw that shouldn't of gone to Moose in the first place. Yes Moose could of made a better play on it and at least knocked it down but still a terrible throw.

The 2nd pick to me did seem like Steves fault. But Jake also had the fumble at the end where he has to hold onto that ball no matter what.

I am a Jake supporter but this is getting old, and I need to see something new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think both Ints were Jake's fault. Both were forced balls. Yea the Wide Receiver should try to make plays but why take a chance and force throws like that. Hit the open man.

The first pass to Moose was under thrown. The only think he could have done better is defended the pass.

The second pass to Smith was bad. Newman was inside anyway so I don't know if Smith could have caught it. Newman being inside was the reason Smith broke to the outside. Newman had already jumped the route. Bad decision by Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both picks were jake fault. the first pass was under thrown horribly and why was moose running a fly anyways. the second was purely his fault. tnewman played smitthy inside and stayed inside...if jake was going to throw it to him than he should have hit him on the outside....smitty stoped the slant bc newman was already there so he went to the outside.not to mention it was 3 people on him it had to be someone else open on that play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...