Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kupchak!?


MountainHeel66

Recommended Posts

With Mitch being bounced from LA and the failures of Rich Cho is there any chance that MJ would seek out Mitch for the front office?

 

Keep in mind that there is a Carolina connection with Mitch and MJ and that Mitch has been one of the longer tenured GM's in the league and has multiple championships. I think it would certainly be a step forward from RC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

I swear some of you don't watch basketball. Kupchak is a terrible GM. If you were mad about the Hornets off season go check out the contracts LA gave out. My god it was bad.

And many think that is more based on the directives of Jim Buss than what MK wanted. And maybe he WOULD be an abject failure, but it really can't be any worse than what Cho has done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MountainHeel66 said:

And many think that is more based on the directives of Jim Buss than what MK wanted. And maybe he WOULD be an abject failure, but it really can't be any worse than what Cho has done. 

Go back to the Kobe and Shaq days. Kupchak is a huge reason Kobe never won more titles. Only good move he ever made was Gasol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...