Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How a 'Bad Move' sticks with a Franchise


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Drafting DJ Augustine over Brook Lopez (2008 Draft):
I think we all knew this was a bad move right when it happened.

If you don't remember - We have drafted, at #9 overall mind you, an undersized PG to come off the bench behind Felton - while ignoring the potential Allstar Center - when your bigs were Okafor (often injured), Diop (bleh) and Nazr (old). You don't have to wait months or years to see the affects of this terrible pick - all it takes is minutes. We also had the #20 pick. In this draft we wanted to walk away Guard and Big. We took the PG first and Hoping one of the other bigs would fall (Hibbert, JaVale, JJ Hickson or Ajinca). A run happened and all we were left with was Ajinca. If we took Lopez at #9, we still would have been able to grab (#22) Courtney Lee, (#25) Nick Batum or (#26) George Hill with the #20 pick. So instead of one bad pick - we doubled down and grabbed 2 terrible picks.

Instead of swallowing our pride and admitting we goofed - the next year - we draft Hendo instead of Allstars PGs = Jrue holiday and Jeff Teague - also there was Ty Lawson who wasn't an Allstar but was much better than Augustine. All three were taken just 4 picks after Hendo. But no worries - We now we have our SG of the future (who can't shoot the 3pt shot). Congrats - 1 bad move has now evolved into 3 really, really bad moves. It only took another season for everything to collapse and we completely started a rebuild after shipping Stephen Jackson and Gerald Wallace out for picks and players.

Signing Lance Stephenson (2014):
This one we all thought was a great move when it happened. I remember where I was when I heard the announcement come over the radio on my way to work.

By the time we figured it out, we were midway through the season and he had become a locker room cancer. We needed to move his contract - or did we? We had signed him to a 2 yr deal with a 3rd year team option. We were already done the 1st year when we decided to ship him to the Clipper for Spencer Hawes. Hawes had 3 years left on his terrible contract. So we basically flipped a bad contract for a even longer bad contract. But it didn't end there. After letting Hawes play for a year and a half (again, almost through with him..) - we decided to flip him for Plumlee. Probably the worst contract/deal I have seen since we traded Tyson Chandler for Erick Dampier.

So essentially, the Lance deal (3yr 27mil w/player option for 3rd) has caused us to go to Plumlee (4yr 48mil). When you keep kicking the can down the road - this is what happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not drafting Lopez was definitely an "ouch" moment.

 

Plumlee trade looks terrible because Hibbert would come off the books and Hawes shortly after (although his 6 mil per looks fantastic in today's market even if he elected to opt into his player option).

 

I keep thinking, with our current contracts...is it even possible to make a competitive play for Curry on the dream scenario that he wants to come "home?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after thinking about our franchise for the past few days and how terrible we really are - i think we need to stop protesting DeVos and Trump and start protesting Cho..

For some reason I thought he was decent at trades and FAs but just sucked at drafts.. now I'm really thinking he is just an overall terrible GM..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Nah I'm still protesting DeVos and Trump

not trying to get this thrown in the tinderbox but... hell mutha-fuggin yeah!!

all my dummie friends, who i used to never be able to have a political conversation with - they now are totally pluggin in to what is going on.. possibly the only good thing the Orange King has done..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bad move after bad move with cho.

besides from the draft, terrible trade after terrible trade, signing lance stephenson and other horrible signings. Oh but he signed Marvin Williams and Nic Batum so hes a good GM in some people's eyes. Give me a great. If he wasn't MJs little bitch boy he would have been fired a long time ago

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cho is completely in over his head.  He has no eye for talent which is a trait he shares with MJ.  Unfortunately, he's willing to agree with everything MJ says, and that's how we've ended up in this situation.  No other professional sports franchise that I'm aware of can say they're owned by the GOAT.  That's pretty damn cool.  However, MJ needs to hire a real GM and stay completely out of the operations of this team.  He's the real problem.  He can't stay out of his own way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was a good breakdown from Daniels.  Last year has had a lasting impact on Young. He still isn't getting the time needed from the OL - the OL we have is made to establish the run and for the run to be in play.  We get behind and have to throw all game we are doomed with this O-line. His receivers have to catch the ball when he makes a good throw to them, he can't have them dropping his good passes. Why are we running 4 slants all toward the same direction?  Why a triple option on 4th and 1? That's on the coaches. Bryce gets hurried and starts slinging the ball where it shouldn't be thrown, more study and recognition from him are needed.  Bryce doesn't step up in the pocket and throws too soon and unbalanced.  He over and under throws the ball because of it.  That's on him.  If the pocket isn't there and he can't get his base set he needs to check down or "live to fight another day." He has been thrown to the wolves and has lost his confidence.  This team doesn't have much, if any, talent and it's a cluster.  I think he can still be an NFL QB.  Maybe not a QB1 in the short term, but if he has a chance with better coaching and personnel he may be better than we are giving him credit for. I think we ruined him last year and have not fixed anything to help him this year.  If we can't run or get way behind all NFL defenses are coming after him.  Dalton has more respect and defenses didn't always sell out to get to him because he'd hit a quick slant, screen, or check down because he has the experience to know what's coming and what to do. Just my 2 cents.
    • All depends on who the backup is. Josh Allen probably would have been benched too if there were better backups than Matt Barkley and Nate peterman.
    • Where did I once say we should draft him because he's a projected Top 5 pick?   That's one of my many problems with you, your reading comprehension skills are very poor (and/or you just don't care to use your brain, one of the two).  I solely used that to point out that me pushing T-Mac isn't some absurd homerism, that at least I'm pushing someone who is deserving of a Top 5 draft pick. And despite me explaining it to you numerous times, you still seem to not grasp how QB's get placed in mock drafts vs draft grades.  They are treated entirely different in mock drafts to any other position, because of how teams generally treat them in the draft because of how important the position is. Literally any other position except QB, mock drafts generally follow draft grades with some team needs factored in.  But with QB's, draft grades are generally disregarded and they ALWAYS put a few QB's at the very top of the draft, because that's just usually what happens.  The exact same thing happened in 2022 with guys like Pickett and Willis widely being Top 10 picks in mock drafts, only for Pickett to fall to what, around 20?, and Willis going in the 2nd round (and even being the 3rd QB if I remember correctly too). The overwhelming majority of draft experts are saying there isn't a high first round grade on these QB's, but they still get mocked there because they're trying to predict how the draft will actually go. That's been my point the entire time, reaching for a QB in a bad QB draft when you have a roster as depleted of talent as ours, does not tend to work out well. And I've never said I'm not open to other players, I've very explicitly said that if a QB or DE stands out come draft time, I'm open to that discussion.  That I'd be open to Hunter as a CB but I prefer a WR over a CB at the top of the draft.  But we're also not talking about the 15th pick here where there could realistically be all sorts of possible picks to discuss.  With the first pick, there really would only be a small handful of options, T-Mac is head and shoulders above any other given our current roster and state of the franchise in general.
×
×
  • Create New...