Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

104.3 The Fan rumor. Panthers like McCaffrey at 8.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

Wonder why our numbers were average withour Cam.

You realize that means we use two different players for rushing, right? Combine them and pretend they're our one runningback. You split plays between Cam and Stewart.

Jesus, then now I get to ask you how was Cam able to run and us having the most scary run attack in 2015? It's like we had 2 runningbacks on the field at the same time. Of course the amount of yards will be lower because of that.

Oher is solid as a starter anyhow. Olsen can block, and wideouts aren't all known for blocking. I can see us getting a nice blocking TE in the draft easy.

We have very few holes, and getting a runningback isn't as stupid as you make it out to be.

Lol you can't just divide then multiply. Cams rushing ability has nothing to do with Stewart and our line. Its known league side that Oher is a bad run blocker and we take a player off the field to put a blocking TE in. Like I said now you are forcing Cam to play in a formation that he doesn't like and for what? So it doesn't look bad we wasted a pick at 8. Like it or not we run the EP out of the gun most of the time and its a wast to have a high pick back playing out of the gun. Just as AP in minny when they used Bridgewater out of the gun. There offense was better but AP struggled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

Lol you can't just divide then multiply. Cams rushing ability has nothing to do with Stewart and our line. Its known league side that Oher is a bad run blocker and we take a player off the field to put a blocking TE in. Like I said now you are forcing Cam to play in a formation that he doesn't like and for what? So it doesn't look bad we wasted a pick at 8. Like it or not we run the EP out of the gun most of the time and its a wast to have a high pick back playing out of the gun. Just as AP in minny when they used Bridgewater out of the gun. There offense was better but AP struggled.

Well yeah, Oher isn't the best of run blockers, but he's still okay.

But like I said, we still had one of the best rushing attacks in 2015, and we need a Stewart replacement soon anyways. It makes perfect sense we go for Fournette if he's available.

Fournette wouldn't be wasted. He'd easily excel. We still have one of the best interiors in the league and get plenty of holes. I can assure you he won't be a waste of a pick at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Castavar said:

That would be fuggin stupid. That's like taking Danny Woodhead/Theo Riddick over Adrian Peterson. However, there is something deep inside me that tells me we would be stupid enough to do it.

Sounds like something you do in a PPR league. New England runs their team like it's a PPR league and they just won a Superbowl so I dunno what's right or wrong here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron1 said:

Here's the way I see it ..

Bush was way better than McCaffrey in college .. and even Bush wasn't that great in the NFL so what's McCaffrey going to be if Bush couldn't be a complete stud ?

Exactly. Anybody taking this guy in the top 10 would be one of the dumbest moves ever. I doubt dollar store dave,  but i refuse to believe he is that damn stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is coming from Lance Taylor giving the guy praise and saying he'd love for him to be a Panther but would be interested to see how he does wherever. 

Where is the part that says the team is interested in him at 8. Several other articles mention ithat in a later round or with a trade down but that's just speculation. I don't think the new wr coach giving a Stanford guy praise counts for the team being interested at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...