Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would Malik Hooker Really Be A Bad Selection at 8?


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Hooker plays centerfield, is a ballhawk, and possesses elite instincts and athleticism.

The last safety to have all that was Earl Thomas. You're insane.

He also misses tackles and is not even comparable on highlight films to Adams. He is not worth a top ten pick in my OPINION. This is an opinion site and yes I am quite insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes not going to make it past the Chargers.  Gus Bradley is their new DC.  He was the orginal DC in Seattle who created legion of boom drafting Earl Thomas in the 1st and Kam Chancellor in the 5th.  Safeties are are vital part of his D and he drools over rangy FS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

No it wouldn't be. Rivera really wanted a coverage safety bad years ago and pushed San Diego to trade up to get Eric Weddle. Worked out well. Hooker would function in the same role as Weddle did for Rivera.

Jamal Adams would be more of a Mike Brown for the Bears in terms of utilization for those trying to understand the difference within the scheme.

He pushed for trading up to get a safety when he was the linebackers coach? That's some serious clout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Oh no, missed tackles... he's a bust.

I guess you wouldn't have drafted TD then.

Tackling can be taught. Speed, instincts, size and hands cannot. 

Tackling was Davis strong point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...