Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mel Kiper's Mock's vs actual Draft picks


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

Panthers:

Kiper: DT Nick Fairley, CB Dre Kirkpatrick, DT Sheldon Richardson, WR Brandin Cooks, OT Andrus Peat, DE Emmanuel Ogbah.

Actual: QB Cam Newton, LB Luke Kuechly, DT Star Lotulelei, WR Kelvin Benjamin, LB Shaq Thompson, DT Vernon Butler.

 

Looks like Hurney did a better job than Mel did.  

NFC SOUTH
Bucs:

Kiper: S Eric Berry, LB Ryan Kerrigan, RB Trent Richardson, LB Alec Ogletree, LB Khalil Mack, QB Jameis Winston, CB Vernon Hargreaves.

Actual: DT Gerald McCoy, DE Adrian Clayborn, S Mark Barron, RB Doug Martin, WR Mike Evans, QB Jameis Winston, CB Vernon Hargreaves.

Falcons:

Kiper: LB Sergio Kindle, WR Torrey Smith, DE Margus Hunt, LB Anthony Barr, DE Dante Fowler Jr, DE Kevin Dodd.

Actual: LB Sean Weatherspoon, WR Julio Jones, CB Desmond Trufant, OT Jake Matthews, DE Vic Beasley, S Keanu Neal.

Saints:

Kiper: DT Jared Odrick, LB Justin Houston, DT Johnathan Hankins, OT Antonio Richardson, DE Vic Beasley, DT A'Shawn Robinson.

Actual: CB Patrick Robinson, DE Cameron Jordan, RB Mark Ingram, S Kenny Vaccaro, WR Brandin Cooks, OT Andrus Peat, LB Stephone Anthony, DT Sheldon Rankins.
 

http://www.phillyvoice.com/your-teams-first-round-picks-2010-if-mel-kipers-initial-mock-drafts-were-accurate/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ThatSeattleBoy said:

Mel does not think the kid from Clemson is a top pick.....

The guy is a moron.

I think GMs purposely  feed him inaccurate info to get a kick out of his foolishness.

Ya think?  Jimmy Clausen says hi

 

Its more like organizations pay him to blow smoke up peoples ass so they have a better chance at getting their guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate Mel as much as the next guy. However, save the cam and Luke picks which he obviously got completely wrong (unless he had Luke going earlier which would then make him actually smarter) you can probably argue that every one of his picks would be more useful to us than our draft pick. Hate to play devils advocate here...


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I hate Mel as much as the next guy. However, save the cam and Luke picks which he obviously got completely wrong (unless he had Luke going earlier which would then make him actually smarter) you can probably argue that every one of his picks would be more useful to us than our draft pick. Hate to play devils advocate here...


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Cooks would've been there, we would've picked him.  Sadly, the only player that was available that Mel Mocked to us was Ogbah.  And he was about as useful as Butler this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I hate Mel as much as the next guy. However, save the cam and Luke picks which he obviously got completely wrong (unless he had Luke going earlier which would then make him actually smarter) you can probably argue that every one of his picks would be more useful to us than our draft pick. Hate to play devils advocate here...


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

richardson, cooks, and peat weren't available when we picked. what's your point again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 2jakefansinva said:

Lmfao

no man i totally get what he's saying like if only the best player in each of these drafts somehow fell to us we would've won these last three superbowls

and i can't help but to feel that it's somehow gettleman's fault that they didn't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...