Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

how will you kill yourself when the falcons win the superbowl


electro's horse

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, theDIRTYcode2 said:

Just jogging your memory. 

you were correct. 

you are still trolling a Panthers message board when your team is having the best year since 97. That says something about you: you suck. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gorillamilitia13 said:

Even if thats true, football comes down to more than just one man. Pats are definitely the better team overall and I don't know how one can deny that.

I think the pats are a little overrated. Big Ben had a horrible game yesterday, and the steelers were without their best player (Bell). If they give us a clean pocket all game Matt Ryan will light that defense up. Brady is also no threat to run with the ball, our pass rush has really gotten better, and they'll get to him, even though the Pats hold a lot like the Packers. The hooded one will really have to come up with a great game plan this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, osiruz said:

I think the pats are a little overrated. Big Ben had a horrible game yesterday, and the steelers were without their best player (Bell). If they give us a clean pocket all game Matt Ryan will light that defense up. Brady is also no threat to run with the ball, our pass rush has really gotten better, and they'll get to him, even though the Pats hold a lot like the Packers. The hooded one will really have to come up with a great game plan this time.

Couple problems I have with this. 

1. How can a team be overrated when they are 14-2, have Tom Brady, Bill B., and the #1 scoring defense?

2. Have you considered that maybe the Patriots are the reason why Big Ben had a bad game?

3. IF they give you guys a clean pocket is an assumption that is far from certain. You can't expect for them to give Matt a clean pocket the whole game and that you guys will be getting after Brady the whole game.

4. What do you mean that he will have to come up with a great plan "this time"? Like he hasn't done that before? I hate the Pats but the man is a genius and arguably the best coach of all time largely due to his ability to be able to adjust his schemes and gameplans to his opponnents. 

Look I completely understand how you think your team is going to win and I do think you guys will have a chance to win but you will have your hands full. Be a little realisitc man! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, gorillamilitia13 said:

Couple problems I have with this. 

1. How can a team be overrated when they are 14-2, have Tom Brady, Bill B., and the #1 scoring defense?

2. Have you considered that maybe the Patriots are the reason why Big Ben had a bad game?

3. IF they give you guys a clean pocket is an assumption that is far from certain. You can't expect for them to give Matt a clean pocket the whole game and that you guys will be getting after Brady the whole game.

4. What do you mean that he will have to come up with a great plan "this time"? Like he hasn't done that before? I hate the Pats but the man is a genius and arguably the best coach of all time largely due to his ability to be able to adjust his schemes and gameplans to his opponnents. 

Look I completely understand how you think your team is going to win and I do think you guys will have a chance to win but you will have your hands full. Be a little realisitc man! 

1. Because they play in a terrible divison without any competent QBS, and had a soft schedule.

2. No he sailed his throws, and overthrew a bunch of wide open recievers. Ithe doesn't help that his WR dropped a bunch of balls, and he had no running game with Leveon out.

3. I'm saying Big Ben had a lot of time to throw. He just had a bad day throwing the ball.

4. The pats have usually been the more talented teams during their superbowl wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, osiruz said:

1. Because they play in a terrible divison without any competent QBS, and had a soft schedule.

2. No he sailed his throws, and overthrew a bunch of wide open recievers. Ithe doesn't help that his WR dropped a bunch of balls, and he had no running game with Leveon out.

3. I'm saying Big Ben had a lot of time to throw. He just had a bad day throwing the ball.

4. The pats have usually been the more talented teams during their superbowl wins.

One could argue the Falcons had a cakewalk of a playoff schedule, and took advantage of a weak NFL year.

It's funny seeing how all of a sudden good offenses start "playing bad" against the number 1 defense against the score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Saca312 said:

One could argue the Falcons had a cakewalk of a playoff schedule, and took advantage of a weak NFL year.

It's funny seeing how all of a sudden good offenses start "playing bad" against the number 1 defense against the score.

Cake walk playing Seattle and GB? Cmon!

 

Someone make an avatar bet with me. Don't be so scurred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, osiruz said:

Cake walk playing Seattle and GB? Cmon!

 

Someone make an avatar bet with me. Don't be so scurred.

To be fair green bay was crippled with injurys.

Atl has an extremely talented team.  

I hate both teams so no bias here.  IMO new england is just too fuging good in every aspect of football for atl to beat them.  Cool thing about the nfl playoff is that alot of times the best team doesn't win.  But if i were a betting man im going patriots......by 90 i hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...