Draft: which scenario would you rather have?

[FootballLivesMatter]

SCENARIO A

1. Cleveland - Myles Garrett
2. San Francisco - Mitch Trubisky
3. Chicago - Deshaun Watson
4. Jacksonville - Dalvin Cook
5. Tennessee - Mike Williams
6. New York - Deshone Kizer
7. San Diego - Malik Hooker
8. Carolina - Jonathan Allen, Jamal Adams, Leonard Fournette, Derek Barnett, Jabrill Peppers

 

SCENARIO B

(A reach for QBs has the Cleveland Browns trading up for the number 8 pick ahead of Buffalo. The Browns make sure that Arizona didn't have a chance to make a move up and grab a QB before them.) 

based on PFT Draft Trade Chart value: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/draft/draft-trade-chart/

#8: 1440 points

#12: 1200 points

#52: 380 points 

Carolina receives: #12 and #52

Cleveland receives: # 8

1. Cleveland - Myles Garrett
2. San Francisco - Mitch Trubisky
3. Chicago - Jonathan Allen
4. Jacksonville - Leonard Fournette
5. Tennessee - Mike Williams
6. New York - Deshaun Watson 
7. San Diego - Jamal Adams
8. Cleveland (trade via Carolina) - Deshone Kizer
9. Cincinnati - Reuben Foster
10. Buffalo - Malik Hooker
11. New Orleans - Marlon Humphrey
12. Carolina (trade via Cleveland) - Derek Barnett
13. Arizona - 

40. Carolina - 
41. Carolina (trade via Cleveland)

 

 

#ThankYouDeshaunWatson#MajorShakeUpInDraft2017#ReachForQuarterbacks

[Daddy_Uncle]

I don't play the make believe scenario for funsies game. Just g8t us some good players

[Kevin Greene]

Either way we're golden.

[Nails]

Plausible since the Browns would obviously not deal with the Bengals.  But would the Saints really pass on Barnett?

[stirs]

B forever

[Yaboychris28]

No way in hell 3 of the top 6 picks are qb's 

[Cpt slay a ho]

Barnett. Would consider wr also, then either Adams or Hooker


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[*FreeFua*]

I'd take option B, not trade the pick and select Malik Hooker!

[CPF4LIFE]

23 minutes ago, Nails said:

Plausible since the Browns would obviously not deal with the Bengals.  But would the Saints really pass on Barnett?

DO NOT WANT BARNETT GOING TO THE SAINTS.

[FootballLivesMatter]

11 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

No way in hell 3 of the top 6 picks are qb's 

Three teams in the top 6 need a quarterback. You could even make a case for Jacksonville and San Diego. How is it, no way in hell? 

[FootballLivesMatter]

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

DO NOT WANT BARNETT GOING TO THE SAINTS with Remmers at OT.

 

[FootballLivesMatter]

29 minutes ago, Nails said:

Plausible since the Browns would obviously not deal with the Bengals.  But would the Saints really pass on Barnett?

Maybe, maybe not. But New Orleans' secondary is damn awful.

[LinvilleGorge]

B, because there's zero chance that Gettleman doesn't take Allen in scenario A.

Though, the epic Huddle meltdown would almost make it worth it.

But my god, we really don't need another 1st round DT 

[FootballLivesMatter]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

B, because there's zero chance that Gettleman doesn't take Allen in scenario A.

Though, the epic Huddle meltdown would almost make it worth it.

But my god, we really don't need another 1st round DT 

I see in some places they have in listed at 260lb. Others at 290. Boy looks 290 to me. However, scouts are saying he can play anywhere on the line which I do agree with from watching a couple cut ups of him. He's a much better run stuffer than pass rusher. Seems more like a 43 DT and 34 DE. But would you play him at DE here?