Why The Hell Do We Keep Talking About "TE"?

[The Lobo]

You think Peppers will come back home for one more year?

[FootballLivesMatter]

Just now, top dawg said:

Gettleman is likely going to do what he always does, and take the BPA. Now what you must ask yourself is is there an OT worth drafting over a top-end TE. Moreover, I think that it is philosophically better to acquire a veteran OT in FA, as they will be decidedly better situated to make an impact than a rookie.

Cam Robinson comes with plenty of red flags on and off the field, I know. But, he has to be one of the the top guy on our board come draft day. 

 

If Gman went BPA, then he would've took Hunter Henry over Butler. He drafted Butler to replace KK. We will see.

[FootballLivesMatter]

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

You think Peppers will come back home for one more year?

Gman lowballness will determine if he does or not

[FootballLivesMatter]

2 minutes ago, Mojo said:

You clearly aren't paying any attention to what I'm saying so knock yourself out.

OT, SS, CB, RB >>>>>>> TE

even add a back up QB before a TE

[Bartin]

1 minute ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

If Gman went BPA, then he would've took Hunter Henry over Butler.

How on earth do you know that? Were you in the draft room? Every report before and after the draft had Butler really high on Getlleman's board. BPA is best player in Gettleman's opinion, not best player in your or anyone else's opinion.

[Mojo]

4 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

OT, SS, CB, RB >>>>>>> TE

even add a back up QB before a TE

Something is clearly wrong with you because you're not picking up what I'm laying down.  Go back and read the other posts and if you don't understand then I truly feel sorry for you.  

I think you're trolling at this point.  Have fun with that but leave me out of it

[top dawg]

2 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

OT, SS, CB, RB >>>>>>> TE

even add a back up QB before a TE

You don't necessarily get better by sticking to some imaginary mental map based on need. You must take the BPA into consideration. That's why outright acquiring solid talent in FA is so important.

[mc52beast]

We NEED another TE to compliment Olsen, not necessarily replace him. And of course since Olsen isn't immortal he's always one injury from ending up on IR, but let's not worry about that.

[FootballLivesMatter]

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You don't necessarily get better by sticking to some imaginary mental map based on need. You must take the BPA into consideration. That's why outright acquiring solid talent in FA is so important.

I don't see TE at this point for next year draft as BPA. 

CB and RB would be considered BPA. Check the projected players coming out for next season first before talking. It's loaded with CBs and RBs. Not much talents there at TE. Taking one in the 2nd or 3rd, I can see. Not one in the damn top 15. We could probably get OJ Howard who is he best TE currently with our 2nd round. That's saying a lot. TE is not BPA.

[FootballLivesMatter]

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

We NEED another TE to compliment Olsen, not necessarily replace him. And of course since Olsen isn't immortal he's always one injury from ending up on IR, but let's not worry about that.

Oh yea that's exactly what happened with our OT positions this season. 

[top dawg]

47 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

We NEED another TE to compliment Olsen, not necessarily replace him. And of course since Olsen isn't immortal he's always one injury from ending up on IR, but let's not worry about that.

Good point! The injury bug is real! Without Olsen, we're as fuged as any team in the league that's missing its main receiver. 

When Gates went down this year, Hunter Henry more than rose to the occasion, and the Chargers didn't skip a beat as far as that is concerned.

[FootballLivesMatter]

9 minutes ago, Mojo said:

Something is clearly wrong with you because you're not picking up what I'm laying down.  Go back and read the other posts and if you don't understand then I truly feel sorry for you.  

I think you're trolling at this point.  Have fun with that but leave me out of it

Leave you out? You voluntarily threw yourself on here

[Lemory]

30 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

When we need not "one" BUT "two" OTs. 

When we need not "one" BUT possibly "two" DEs. 

 

I dont think you need quotation marks around one and two. 

[FootballLivesMatter]

Just now, Lemory said:

I dont think you need quotation marks around one and two. 

I don't think you need to be at Chuck E. Cheese