Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One Guy not playing


PntherPryd

How should commish handle inactive player?  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. How should commish handle inactive player?

    • do nothing
    • submit lineup based on league "coach" feature one time only
      0
    • submit lineup based on coach every week
      0


Recommended Posts

It's complicated by the fact that he has LT who is out this week, so if the vote goes toward setting lineup for him for one week only LT would be on bench rest of season.

Two guys already have blowout wins so I'm leaning toward doing nothing. The guy did pay so maybe he'll show up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pay to play, you pay to lose. It's up to you to submit your lineup and do the work to make sure you have the best chance to win.

If this continues to be his operation - I might see this stacking up the playoffs for that conference a bit based on point differentials and possibly creating some matchup problems then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or conference rather.

Four guys from each conference get into playoffs (Minter, Topcats, etc.) This makes a total of 16 teams out of 48 that advance to postseason play and they are re-seeded based on record.

Of the four, three are automatic and they are the division winners. The four guys in each division play each other twice, btw.

The fourth conference playoff team is the wildcard team chosen via best record with a long list of tie-breakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You would have to pay me good money to party with that clown.
    • Morgan still has a little John Fox in him. Got to value those RBs even though they have been devalued for around a decade now. Never go more than 2-3 years on a contract unless he is a superstar, never pay high money and never draft a RB high unless you are set everywhere else. We failed on the first and third rules.
    • This is some good solid logic. I still go back to the teams think tank and it includes the current Dan Morgan, each looked over the roster of holes and came to a clear conclusion that the RB needed improving. They could have gave the same 2022 Miles contract to Hubbard, but didn't. Next up Morgan trades up for a RB with sanders and Hubbard here in his last year. While the edge group is lead bye Charles "panthers are the only team that wanted me " harris Hubbard keeps grinding and improves along with the OL, *now* months after seeing brooks on the field and watching hub get like 5.1 ypc...the brain trust goes and gives him a updated miles contract.........Just a odd timeline of events, I believe all of us can agree on that. Just the market is at the lowest its ever been for RBs and this team is 2-7 with other losing seasons with hubbard chugging along as a cheap rookie. I do agree with you sorta need 2 starting level RBs, so use a mid-rounder or sign one in FA for 2-4 per. Hubbard signed for more than King Henry, sure age and all. Id still want Henry for 8per over 2 years than hubbard 8.3 over 2(his cut point) Honestly part of is still pissed form the Herniay era and spending top draft picks and top level cap space on RBs. I love the guy but they even signed toldozer for upper money with stew and dwill, just poor management of resources. Now 20 years later, history repeats while the league is laughing at the Panthers. I want to over spend and over use draft capital on WRs, edge, and DL. At they rotate and play at the same time, panthers never used stew and dwill at the same time while both were top 5 paid. ugh 
×
×
  • Create New...