Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Seahawks Gameday thread....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

3:00 left in 1Q and you can just feel how close this game is to being broken open by the Seahawks. 

This season is very, very close to surpassing even the lowest of my expectations I had in August and after this shellacking we are going to receive tonight, I won't be that upset because it means we are that much closer to the season being over. Sad. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn I cant believe how bad everything has gotten in just around 3 months since the start of the year.  This one really turned in a hurry.  I have held out hope against odds but now I realize our run is over.  Feel like some changes need to be made in regards to some of our coaches.  We need new blood at the OC position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Honestly, I like this matchup: Two crap olines duking it out seeing which one is worse.

In all honesty, if you look at last week, we began working magic with our patchwork o-line in the 3rd quarter, with that practice squad center starting.

We might not be as bad off as the seahawks oline this game

This will come out to who can get the most sacks this game as the winner. Doesn't matter how inept/strong the secondary is, with a nasty front that stuff doesn't matter.

Whoever has the Seahawks or Panthers defense starting in fantasy will be rewarded greatly.

Tell us more, oh wise one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, luke nukem said:

fug off

you're a fuging retard. the attitude that just because a player is the star so he shouldn't be punished in public is the same attitude that lets guys get away with things like sexual assault.

cam fuged up somehow and he doesnt need people like you crying for him. now go back to suck on cam's dick some more and tell him itll be ok because he's the mvp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...