Steph wont rule out signing with the Hornets next season.

[nctarheel0619]

13 minutes ago, Montsta said:

 Steph Curry can only sign for max money with the Warriors. I think he would have to leave like $50MM or something like that to sign somewhere else. 

Only way he signs with Charlotte from a money perspective is if MJ buys out the remainder of his UA contract and pays all associated legal fees, and then champions Nike to give Steph a $400MM Nike contract to offset. 

He can do the same here, after he signs for a one year deal.  So......

[Montsta]

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

He can do the same here, after he signs for a one year deal.  So......

I'm just telling you according to NBA rules no one can match what the Warriors can offer him. 

[nctarheel0619]

6 minutes ago, Montsta said:

I'm just telling you according to NBA rules no one can match what the Warriors can offer him. 

That's cool.  But LeBron took less money to go back to Cleveland....

[Montsta]

24 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

That's cool.  But LeBron took less money to go back to Cleveland....

Because Miami was dying and Cleveland had way more talent. 

Lets not make Lebron a martyr for "going home" when we all know that Cleveland was wayyyy more stacked than Miami.

If Steph goes to Charlotte I will have way more respect for him for truly "going home" than bitch ass Lebron. 

Leaving the stacked Warriors to go to a middle of the pack team is real dedication. If Steph chooses to do that I will have no hard feelings. 

[nctarheel0619]

1 hour ago, Montsta said:

Because Miami was dying and Cleveland had way more talent. 

Lets not make Lebron a martyr for "going home" when we all know that Cleveland was wayyyy more stacked than Miami.

If Steph goes to Charlotte I will have way more respect for him for truly "going home" than bitch ass Lebron. 

Leaving the stacked Warriors to go to a middle of the pack team is real dedication. If Steph chooses to do that I will have no hard feelings. 

To be fair, if Steph comes back home.  We'll be the 2nd best team in the East.  Hell, if that, could be number 1 with LeBron turning 33.  And I agree.  Miami still had talent, but it was getting older.  

[pantherphan96]

1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

This literally makes no sense.  He brought them one ring already nothing to prove.  

If Draymond doesn't get suspended Warriors win that series in 5. No matter what Lebron says there is a rivalry between the Warriors-Cavs and I don't think Curry would leave the Warriors if they made the Finals only to lose again. Curry and the rest of Warriors definitely want to beat the Cavs in the Finals for revenge.

I think there is a greater chance he goes to Charlotte if he gets a 2nd ring this year. Either way I highly doubt he leaves that juggernaut for a middling team in the East that can't compete with the contenders.

[nctarheel0619]

2 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

If Draymond doesn't get suspended Warriors win that series in 5. No matter what Lebron says there is a rivalry between the Warriors-Cavs and I don't think Curry would leave the Warriors if they made the Finals only to lose again. Curry and the rest of Warriors definitely want to beat the Cavs in the Finals for revenge.

I think there is a greater chance he goes to Charlotte if he gets a 2nd ring this year. Either way I highly doubt he leaves that juggernaut for a middling team in the East that can't compete with the contenders.

Haha, a fuging rivalry?  It's not a damn rivalry.  Celtics/Lakers was a rivalry.  Knicks/Pacers was a rivalry.  This is 2017 in the NBA.  These players don't care about a rivalry.  They would rather join up and hangout with each other.  Get out of here with that poo.  

[pantherphan96]

1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

That's cool.  But LeBron took less money to go back to Cleveland....

To a team with 3 #1 draft picks, one of whom was an All-Star and two others who were attractive trade bait. Miami had an aging and oft-injured Wade, Bosh wasn't a lock to stay in Miami, and a depleted crew of washed up bench players and mediocre role players.

[pantherphan96]

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Haha, a fuging rivalry?  It's not a damn rivalry.  Celtics/Lakers was a rivalry.  Knicks/Pacers was a rivalry.  This is 2017 in the NBA.  These players don't care about a rivalry.  They would rather join up and hangout with each other.  Get out of here with that poo.  

Lebron isn't going on banana boat rides with Draymond for sure. Klay was mocking him throughout the Finals.

If they face off again it would be the first time 2 teams have faced off in the Finals 3 years in a row.

It's not vintage Lakers-Celtics or 90's Pistons-Bulls but its the closest thing to a non-divisional rivalry in the NBA today.

[nctarheel0619]

11 hours ago, pantherphan96 said:

Lebron isn't going on banana boat rides with Draymond for sure. Klay was mocking him throughout the Finals.

If they face off again it would be the first time 2 teams have faced off in the Finals 3 years in a row.

It's not vintage Lakers-Celtics or 90's Pistons-Bulls but its the closest thing to a non-divisional rivalry in the NBA today.

LOL, okay.  Sure.  Whatever you say man.