Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#13 KB


FutureDynasty

Should we trade Kelvin Benjamin for a 3rd or 4th round draft pick?  

70 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we trade Kelvin Benjamin for a 3rd or 4th round draft pick?

    • Yes
      21
    • No
      48


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, FutureDynasty said:

Let's be real here he is nothing more than a number 2 receiver. Should we trade him and get back our 4th that Nipple Shorts gave up for a punter?  What say you Huddle?

I wouldn't say fug you because that's not who I am.  But.......anyway.  Just messin with you.  I'll keep KB though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

Some of yall need to put down the bottle..

KB was the only one who got in the coaches azzes today..he is frustrated because Shula is calling dumb azz plays out there..

 

Shula didn't lose us this game. 

KB likely is our least diverse WR on the roster....I think he was mad because they kept putting him on the sideline 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

Some of yall need to put down the bottle..

KB was the only one who got in the coaches azzes today..he is frustrated because Shula is calling dumb azz plays out there..

 

 

He also ran his route one yard short and then only realized it when he was already 5 yards out of bounds stretched the ball out. 

KB needs better talent around him in order to be a No. 1. It would start with the OL if our GM ever gets his hand out of his ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, truthjuice said:

No, I think KB just needs to work on his route running. He's not a bad player and if he had the art of route running down, he'd be awesome. 

Yeah his route on that 3rd and 10 that set up that punt on the 2nd to last drive was really bad(Rivera still should have went for it).  He just seems to disappear too consistently to be a true #1 difference maker WR in the NFL IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...