biggest reason why we are 4 and 6

[juliosantos]

what you guys think?

[cptx]

E. All of the Above

[uncfan888]

If you pay attention to the forum, you already know what everyone will choose. But I was just thinking we needed another thread like this, so thanks OP

[frash.exe]

bad luck really

[nctarheel0619]

Combo between 1 & 2.  

[uncfan888]

Just now, 15 said:

this really.

bad luck, loss of momentum/swag, and preparation by the coaches. this includes half time adjustments. 

Don't tell the Gettleman haters that 

[CRA]

How is OL not also an option? 

Or does that just fall under Gettledouche? Because if that is the case young secondary and Gettledouche are going to be splitting votes they should share.

[Evil Hurney]

16 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

bad luck really

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

[UKPanther94]

Coaching, there is no reason why we shouldn't be 6-4 right now at least

[LinvilleGorge]

Injuries have played a very underrated role, particularly Oher. We were already weak at OT and Oher going down really stressed that weakness.

The coaches have done a poor job of in-game adjustments which is shown in our poor second half performances. Unfortunately, this is nothing new. Our coaches do abgood job prepping for games but they seem completely incapable of adjusting on the fly.

Gettleman did a poor job of addressing the weaknesses on the roster. 

[frash.exe]

22 minutes ago, 15 said:

this really.

bad luck, loss of momentum/swag, and preparation by the coaches. this includes half time adjustments. 

love that avi

[frash.exe]

22 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

i can't help but go back to the colts win last year; we really should've lost that game but we didn't. in fact, had the overtime rules still been the same as they were a few years ago before they were changed, we would've lost that game when they marched down the field and got their field goal first in overtime.

i'm not going to argue that the 2015 team wasn't better because they were; but they were also a lot luckier than we are now. last year we were also lucky against the saints in both games and the giants. unfortunately we don't have a perpetual horseshoe stuck up our ass like seattle has had since 2012.

[AceBoogie]

22 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

WE HAD THE LEAD AFTER CAM THREW THE PICK 6. WE HAD THE DAMN BALL WITH LESS THAN A MINUTE TO GO. 

[t96]

23 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

Could be even better as well. First Aints game was winnable if not for a few plays like Gano's miss and their rookie kicker's 50+ yard winner. And Vikings game is probably a win if KB doesn't block in the back on that long Fozzy TD. That changed the whole game.