Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SNF: Packers vs Redskins


FootballLivesMatter

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, ichigo1057 said:

That 2 point attempt was kind of dumb. If you take the extra point it makes it a 4 point game vs not making the 2 point leaving the score only a FG difference. No real advantage that I can see going for the 2 even with the high winds.

they were probably aware of the 11 missed extra points today (most since 1966) so decided to take the higher percentage play (today that is) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

they were probably aware of the 11 missed extra points today (most since 1966) so decided to take the higher percentage play (today that is) 

That is a good point though I think I would still take the extra point in that situation and show trust in my kicker. Well, actually it is hard to say with Gano since I have to force myself to watch every time he comes up to kick. On a different note that was a weak flag for roughing the passer especially considering the brutal hits Cam takes and don't get flagged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

We were looking at Whitner, Brown and Griffin. Signed Brown then released him. Then signed Griffin. The guy Gman chose not to sign (Whitner) doesn't look too bad for the Skins since signing there. I wonder why Gman chose the other two guys over Whitner. 

Whitner hasn't looked that great and anyways he claimed that we made him an offer. If that's true it just came down to the Skins offering more. Griffin's been fine, not much worse if at all than Whitner. And Boston has come on lately and looked pretty good. Better than Whitner in recent weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I see this is a thread about SNF.

But actually, it's 3 pages of complaining about calls the Panthers don't get and making fun of ex Panthers.

Lame board is lame.

So ... I'll start. WTF happened to the Pack? They're awful this season. Also, Jamison Crowder is pretty damn good.

Redskins about to be 6-3-1, Giants 7-3, Lions and Vikes both 6-4.

Hopefully the Playoffs talk can die around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Still Brooklyn said:

So, I see this is a thread about SNF.

But actually, it's 3 pages of complaining about calls the Panthers don't get and making fun of ex Panthers.

Lame board is lame.

So ... I'll start. WTF happened to the Pack? They're awful this season. Also, Jamison Crowder is pretty damn good.

Redskins about to be 6-3-1, Giants 7-3, Lions and Vikes both 6-4.

Hopefully the Playoffs talk can die around here.

Our route to the playoffs goes through BofA on Chirstmas eve. All those wildcard contenders are irrelevant, we'll end with a better seed than them regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He said himself in his interviews today that he is more of a chess piece to move around and mentioned he's been working a lot with Nolan Smith jr.
    • Here is how we move back:  First, Offensive tackle is not good in free agency.  The Draft: The Jets need a LT.  Will Campbell is the consensus best Tackle in the draft, and they take him.  All those other teams (I count 6-8 who need a T--and I see KC STARVING for one after the Super Bowl) decide they need to move up to get the best pure LT in the draft, Kelvin Banks out of Texas.  After Banks and Campbell, there is a pretty sharp drop in talent level, dropping from A players to B players. The next two OTs are Right Tackles, so anyone needing a LT would have to hope the fifth overall OT, Wyatt Milum (arguably) would be there at the end of the first round.  Knowing that so many bidders are doing the same thing and they all have phones, I honestly think that Campbell or Banks is there when the Panthers pick and the phone will be ringing.  If they both go before the Panthers pick, crickets.  Here is the Math: Likely to be gone when Panthers pick: Ward, QB Carter, Edge Sanders, QB Graham, DL Hunter, WR/CB Likely to be available when Panthers pick:  There are 2 picks before the Panthers pick once those five get gone.  Among those are these players: McMillan WR Johnson, CB Will Campbell, OT James Pearce, Edge Javon Walker, Superhero.  If we only had 10 more.  (LB) Kelvin Banks, OT Now, if I am a GM on a team that needs an OT, I feel fairly strong that an OT is not going in the top 5.  I am working on potential trades for the seventh and eighth picks, ready to make a deal as soon as Campbell or Banks goes off the board. The Raiders pick 6th--they have needs at OT, WR, and CB if you assume they sign a QB in free agency; I think Darnold goes there, personally.   Regardless, there are no QBs worth #7 overall (unless Sanders falls), so they will draft an OT or CB--in my view,.  They are going to shop in free agency with a lot of $$$.  I am guessing they get their CB then.  the Raiders' will likely draft OT Campbell, but do not rule out TMac:   Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Offensive Tackle Cornerback Wide Receiver Running Back The Jets pick 8th.  Of course, their phone will be ringing off the hook for Banks if this happens, and the Jets have many needs now that Rodgers and Adams are gone.  While they too need an OT, they have more pressing needs as well.  Edge rusher is their biggest need listed here after QB, but their defense was ranked #3 in the NFL last year (I was surprised).  Their offense was ranked 23rd.  They will be focused on revamping the Offense with the losses of Rodgers and Adams.  I see them taking a T or Tmac.  Biggest Weaknesses: Quarterback Edge-Rusher Wide Receiver Safety Interior Defensive Line Offensive Tackle In this scenario, the only ways the Panthers can trade back is: 1. If the Raiders do not take an OT and the Jets do. 2. If the Jets refuse trade offers and take the best available edge or WR at #7. 3. Both OTs are gone and a team wants the best CB or WR in the draft and is willing trade up.  I do not see a lot of depth in this draft at CB or #1 WR.  What may cause the Panthers to stay put and pick:  1. Edge.  They see Pearce or Green as part of the second-tier edges and need one of them. 2. They like TMac and see the offense taking the next step with him, knowing they can address IDL in round 2 and have Clowney and Wonnum for another season.  3.  The do not re-sign Mike Jax and need an outside CB and have the chance to draft Johnson to pair with Horn.  4.  They fall in love with Walker and Evero develops a boner on how to use him properly.  From this perspective, I would give the chance of trade back slightly under 50% I would speculate that if we draft, we take Pearce, Johnson, or McMillan.  I do not see Walker being a good fit here, but I understand why some of you like him.
    • we fixed ours in free agency. a rookie is not an immediate answer.
×
×
  • Create New...