Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SNF: Packers vs Redskins


FootballLivesMatter

Recommended Posts

Of all the seemingly obvious catches that have been ruled incomplete, it's pretty unbelievable THAT was ruled a catch. Like the announcers were saying, had that occurred in the field of play, there's zero chance it would've been ruled a catch and fumble. It would've been called incomplete all day long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

That is a touchdown catch for the Packers but if that was the Panthers, oh, you bet that's incomplete.

If that were in the field and not the endzone it would have been incomplete. Do you happen to know how that was a TD? Does the endzone have different rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

Why Panthers related? 

Noticing this "Ty Nsekhe" LT replacing Trent Williams. So far, putting on a show against Clay Matthews. Also, had a great game vs Minnesota last week. 

RFA in 2017. 

He looks solid, but Clay has sort of declined. I will keep on eye on this dude though. Thanks for the info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

He's awful now.  

Yeah I haven't really kept track of him since he went to the Bears other than when we happen to play him and the occasion non Panther game I catch. Don't hear his name come up much so that's usually not a good sign. Never the less he did make a pretty good play tipping that pass, only thing that would have made it better would be someone getting under it for the interception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

If that were in the field and not the endzone it would have been incomplete. Do you happen to know how that was a TD? Does the endzone have different rules?

I was trying to find the exact rule but couldn't find it. There's no falling to the ground so that portion doesn't apply. The fact that the ref said the play stood rather than confirmed makes me believe that if it was initially called incomplete, it would've stayed that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...