Pssst... Bradberry is really good.

[pantherphan96]

#2 among rookie CBs

[Davidson Deac II]

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

And then picture no Star, KK, or Turner.

Don't get me wrong, I think Gettleman has done a good job overall, so far.  But like anyone, he makes mistakes.  He could have kept Norman tagged for this year, still drafted Worley and Bradberry, without impacting our ability to sign any of those guys.  That way, we might actually see if they work out before letting Norman walk.  Norman and Bradberry, with Mcclain and Worley backing them up, would have been a solid group of corners with no long term impact on our salary cap.   And who knows, Norman might have actually made a big play against Tampa, or KC, or Denver, or the Saints.  Enough to have us at 4-5 or 5-4. 

[top dawg]

Say what you want, but this season would be different with Norman on one side and Braberry on the other. It would have, and deep down in your soul, you know it.

Letting J-No play on the tag didn't have poo to do with KK, Star, or anyone else. That sleight of hand ain't working on me.

[Cj72]

Edit***

Ignore me, I'm an idiot at times haha

[Davidson Deac II]

2 minutes ago, Cj72 said:

I hope it's not just because everyone else sucks so their guy is wide open

Its 45% of passes thrown at him, so no.  

[CPF4LIFE]

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Say what you want, but this season would be different with Norman on one side and Braberry on the other. It would have, and deep down in your soul, you know it.

Letting J-No play on the tag didn't have poo to do with KK, Star, or anyone else. That sleight of hand ain't working on me.

bingo

[CPF4LIFE]

Woooww....ONE of our draft picks is legit so far. I'm so giddy.

[Cj72]

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Its 45% of passes thrown at him, so no.  

Oops. You are 100% correct. Reading comprehension is not my friend tonight lol

[Mr. Scot]

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Say what you want, but this season would be different with Norman on one side and Braberry on the other. It would have, and deep down in your soul, you know it.

Letting J-No play on the tag didn't have poo to do with KK, Star, or anyone else. That sleight of hand ain't working on me.

Assuming he would have.

Prior to being tagged, he told Zod he'd hold out.  After the tag was rescinded, he said he'd have signed it, but would he really have done so?

I'm not convinced of that.

[jayflip]

2 hours ago, 15 said:

@CPantherKing

should we chalk this up as another Gettleman mistake?

5 pages deep and he hasn't derped his deeply thought process yet. I'm worried. 

[Davidson Deac II]

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Assuming he would have.

Prior to being tagged, he told Zod he'd hold out.  After the tag was rescinded, he said he'd have signed it, but would he really have done so?

I'm not convinced of that.

If he held out, so be it.  We wouldn't be in any worse shape than we are now.  

[chknwing]

does it still count against him when the wr blows past him and has to be covered by the safety?

[CRA]

39 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because as we all know, cornerbacks never improve. What you see in the middle of their rookie season is what they'll be their entire career.

Who said players never improve? 

My only point is in the NFL you can't just assume players will become what you hope they will and mark it as a fixed issue

so we can't say our secondary problems are now solved.  Maybe they will be.  Maybe some of the positions will be.  We don't know yet.  End of the year we will evaluate their progress...Thurs is another huge chance to show something.  KC game wasn't. 

So we don't know.  We may need a starting S or CB this offseason.  Can't check it off because we are working on a group this year 

[nctarheel0619]

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Assuming he would have.

Prior to being tagged, he told Zod he'd hold out.  After the tag was rescinded, he said he'd have signed it, but would he really have done so?

I'm not convinced of that.

I don't think anybody cares if you're convinced or not.