Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are now 3rd in the league in sacks


Recommended Posts

Damn I'm genuinely surprised to read that. If the D can keep up their recent stellar play, they may just be able to turn this thing around and make some noise in January...lord knows we have seen this team go on huge winning streaks in the past, with arguably less talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my "Bye Bye Huddle (for three weeks)" thread I made mention of the streak the Panthers were about to go on. Not based on intuition or blind fandom but the reality that a Shula/Rivera/McDermott combination seem to finally get on the same page around midway through a season and really take off in the last 6-8 games. The pass rush has come back, the offense is struggling because receivers can't get open and Cam isn't scrambling near as much, and we are playing typical complimentary football again. 

Here's to hoping the Falcan'ts fall off at some point because we have the ability to take hold of this division in the next 4 weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

Accidentally double posted. Someone please delete this one. 

Delete the one with responses? lol

More sacks please. And on the other side, fewer sacks for Cam. This team has to get 'r done up front or it's 'wait til next year'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, caatfan said:

Delete the one with responses? lol

More sacks please. And on the other side, fewer sacks for Cam. This team has to get 'r done up front or it's 'wait til next year'. 

Ha I guess I picked the wrong one. Yeah that's true. I think not having Kalil really hurt us playing against Donald. And the improvement of the D-line coupled with having Worley and Bradberry healthy, as well as the emergence of Johnson, has been key for the defense's improvement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...