Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs waive previous 2nd round corner...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, The_Rainmaker said:

I have seen Banks play &  he is better Worley the Stats dont lie son.  Its not like Lenoard Johnson was with the same team and got released but guess what he was picked up. 

 

LLLLLLL

Screen Shot 2016-10-31 at 7.17.15 PM.png

Screen Shot 2016-10-31 at 8.24.51 PM.png

I don't think you have. So why did the Bucs release him in the middle of the season with a struggling secondary.Again how are you comparing a rookie with 7 games to a 4 year vet ? Numbers do lie so going by your logic Bamks was better then Revis during the 2013 and 2014 because he had more interception and tackles then Revis. Johnson has nothing to do with this conversation. Johnson only played in 1 game for all we know his play can fall off a cliff. Too small of a sample size. If your trying to make a weak ass argument that banks would be great here because of Johnson you are foolish by that logic we should sign major wright and all the other Bucs cast offs . Again hold the L and hold the L for the rest of your life you seem to like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point anyone has to be an improvement over Sanchez, anytime I see him out there I get legitimately scared he will be burned for a td or trucked by a running back into the stands. The guy is tiny as fug and looks slow, that is a terrible combination for a cb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Bradbury coming back soon hopefully, Worley progressing a bit and Johnson at the very least servicable I don't think Sanchez sees too much of the field going forward if at all.

I will be OK letting the team decide if he is a worthy addition or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Benotheking said:

I don't think you have. So why did the Bucs release him in the middle of the season with a struggling secondary.Again how are you comparing a rookie with 7 games to a 4 year vet ? Numbers do lie so going by your logic Bamks was better then Revis during the 2013 and 2014 because he had more interception and tackles then Revis. Johnson has nothing to do with this conversation. Johnson only played in 1 game for all we know his play can fall off a cliff. Too small of a sample size. If your trying to make a weak ass argument that banks would be great here because of Johnson you are foolish by that logic we should sign major wright and all the other Bucs cast offs . Again hold the L and hold the L for the rest of your life you seem to like them.

What dude if your talking about eye test , Worley may have 1 good game , how many TDs  and crucial 3rd down has he given up ?

How come we released Bene? There are a lot circumstances to why players get released and its not  like they don't get picked up by other teams when they  have a down year.

 

Now hold the L 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The_Rainmaker said:

What dude if your talking about eye test , Worley may have 1 good game , how many TDs  and crucial 3rd down has he given up ?

How come we released Bene? There are a lot circumstances to why players get released and its not  like they don't get picked up by other teams when they  have a down year.

 

Now hold the L 

Ok I get it now your blind. It all make sense now. How many TD and crucial 3rd down did Banks give up? Way more then Worley. Bene was release because he gave up almost 300 yards to ATL and Banks was released because he was a liability on the field. This is what you don't get at this point  Worley is better then a player who was always a liability for his entire career. Who offers no upside. Worley will get better every week banks won't. Now take the L. Hold the L. Make love to it because you seem to like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Rainmaker said:

What dude if your talking about eye test , Worley may have 1 good game , how many TDs  and crucial 3rd down has he given up ?

How come we released Bene? There are a lot circumstances to why players get released and its not  like they don't get picked up by other teams when they  have a down year.

 

Now hold the L 

Banks was a 4th year player still making rookie mistakes and no real progress. Worley is a rookie who has made some rookie mistakes but is getting better every week and making progress. Who would you rather have a 4th year player still making rookie mistakes with no upside or a rookie who is getting better every game and has upside ? Again take another L and another L and one more for good luck L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The_Rainmaker said:

Haha yeah right making rookie mistakes which is of bunch bs , yes Worely is getting better but Banks is better and can get better also.
 

 


Now tattoo that L on your forehead


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

Thanks for saying I'm right. At least you know I'm right. Haha your using a YouTube highlight of a 2nd round bust to validate that he is better then Worley is foolish. How is does YouTube highlights  working for him in 2016? Since we are using YouTube highlights to justify a player lets bring in RG3 and a bunch of 2013 and 2014 YouTube highlight wonders in 2016. Again take the L. Name you kid L. Change your name to L you seem to like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Lucanna-Farms-CBD-Gummies-Ive-Tested-Must-Read-Customer-Genuine-Result/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Lucanna-Farms-CBD-Gummies-New-Updated-Honest-Customer-WarninG-Exposed-Ingredients/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Natures-Leaf-CBD-Gummies-New-Updated-Honest-Customer-WarninG-Exposed-Ingredients/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Alpha-Labs-CBD-Gummies-A-Warning-Alert-from-Honest-Analytical-ExperT-EXPosed-Benefits/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Zappify-Reviews-A-Warning-Alert-from-Honest-Analytical-ExperT-EXPosed-Benefits/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Alpha-Labs-CBD-Gummies/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/Lucanna-Farms-CBD-Gummies/   https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/puravive-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/the-genius-wave-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-price-39/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/java-burn-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/sugar-defender-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/sumatra-slim-belly-tonic-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/proDentim-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/flowforce-max-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/ https://www.portsmouth-dailytimes.com/calendar/neotonics-reviews-a-warning-alert-from-a-analytical-experT-eXPosed-ingredients-49/  
    • CMC had 1 game under Wilks and had 13 carries. His carries per game have stayed the same  in San Francisco if not gone up
    • Considering the Panthers under Rhule and Wilks were content to run him into the ground as their offensive “strategy”, is it any wonder? Subpar QB play, a below average OL and one decent WR in DJ Moore pretty much guaranteed his career would be a short one if he stayed here and not much hope of things improving. But that’s JMO. We did the right thing allowing him to leave for greener pastures.  You’re certainly not wrong just looking at it from a different perspective.
×
×
  • Create New...