Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera presser


CarolinaSunday

Recommended Posts

What are teams doing to our pass rush? Not respecting our DE play and doubling the DTs.

all it takes is a night at a Holiday Inn Ron to know that.  Plus combine that with your DBs are so scared of getting beat, since they can't really cover, they give easy underneath balls all game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ENC Pantherfan said:

So he pretty much said that letting Norman go was a mistake, so my question is is this a move that Rivera signed off on or was this a solo Gettlean move?

Quote from the post Norman press conference:

"I've learned to trust Dave and I'm going to trust Dave on this one."

Safe to say it was solely a Gettleman decision and that Ron wasn't very happy about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Quote from the post Norman press conference:

"I've learned to trust Dave and I'm going to trust Dave on this one."

Safe to say it was solely a Gettleman decision and that Ron wasn't very happy about it.

Then why is half the huddle wanting Rivera gone? If anything this one IS on Gettleman. How the hell you gonna make changes like that and not consult with the HC? This entire time I though Ron and Gettleman was on the same page but I guess I'm wrong. It's gonna end up like the Colts were the HC's vison and the GM's vision are not the same. 

 

Also Ron Rivera needs to have more say so in the roster. Obviously he didn't want to go into the season with his roster like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ENC Pantherfan said:

Then why is half the huddle wanting Rivera gone? If anything this one IS on Gettleman. How the hell you gonna make changes like that and not consult with the HC? This entire time I though Ron and Gettleman was on the same page but I guess I'm wrong. It's gonna end up like the Colts were the HC's vison and the GM's vision are not the same. 

 

Also Ron Rivera needs to have more say so in the roster. Obviously he didn't want to go into the season with his roster like this. 

Just because Gettleman made a mistake doesn't mean Rivera isn't at fault.  He has a lot of blatant flaws ie. how poorly managed the MNF Buccaneers game was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...