Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A legitimate reason as to why we will make a run

SwagAces9030

By SwagAces9030,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SwagAces9030 Newbie

SwagAces9030

Posted
Posted

By run I do not mean 10-0... I could see 9-1, or 8-2 and i'll explain. Everyone is overly frustrated with the struggling secondary, but the answer is on our roster. Bradberry came out week 1, and took a beating by Thomas. That said it was his first start ever against a very talented WR, but Bradberry still looked the part. He came out week 2 and played great, the only TD he 'gave up' was the deep ball where Tre was late coming over the top. (He was the number 1 rated CB for week 2) If we have him against Atlanta (we still lose) but Julio does not go off for 300 yards. The big play to Mike Evans the next game I don't feel happens with him on the field, and I also feel the bomb to Cooks this week doesn't happen. I feel with Bradberry healthy and on the field after the bye week he will shore up a lot of the issues you see going on. He will not be perfect, but with our offense finally finding its groove (Mainly due to Stewart being back) I feel it will be enough to limit the big plays and finally start racking off some W's. I know we lost but it was nice to see the offense finally click. This team is used to going on runs, we have done it 3 years in a row now I see no reason as to why we can't find ourselves 5-5 or 6-5 at some point this season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwagAces9030 Newbie

SwagAces9030

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, KillaCamNewton said:

dude...the fun's over. this year was a waste. our best hope is to get in the top 5 and pick a game changer like the Cowboys got with Zeke and be able to go right back to being a contender

I agree that we do need a game changer at the RB position, Stewart can only last so long. To me Fozzy and CAP are NOT the answers to the backfield once Stew hangs it up or wears out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
greghardy'sAK-47 Newbie

greghardy'sAK-47

Posted
Posted

I can't look at the worst secondary along with one of the worst pass rushes in football and think they are going to all of sudden flip the switch.  The entire defense is on skates.  The offense, with Cam playing well, might be good enough to win some games against the teams with both a bad D and bad O, but looking at the remaining schedule they are few and far between.  If they go 5-5 down the stretch that would be really solid for this team, but not in terms of draft position though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Rainmaker Newbie

The_Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, SwagAces9030 said:

By run I do not mean 10-0... I could see 9-1, or 8-2 and i'll explain. Everyone is overly frustrated with the struggling secondary, but the answer is on our roster. Bradberry came out week 1, and took a beating by Thomas. That said it was his first start ever against a very talented WR, but Bradberry still looked the part. He came out week 2 and played great, the only TD he 'gave up' was the deep ball where Tre was late coming over the top. (He was the number 1 rated CB for week 2) If we have him against Atlanta (we still lose) but Julio does not go off for 300 yards. The big play to Mike Evans the next game I don't feel happens with him on the field, and I also feel the bomb to Cooks this week doesn't happen. I feel with Bradberry healthy and on the field after the bye week he will shore up a lot of the issues you see going on. He will not be perfect, but with our offense finally finding its groove (Mainly due to Stewart being back) I feel it will be enough to limit the big plays and finally start racking off some W's. I know we lost but it was nice to see the offense finally click. This team is used to going on runs, we have done it 3 years in a row now I see no reason as to why we can't find ourselves 5-5 or 6-5 at some point this season.  

I agree man, Bradberry can help cover half of the field and if you have Teddy on the other side his speed will help him recover if he bites on double move. Also the offense is on a roll and if we play similar to Dallas style O the secondary will not be exposed as much! KEEP POUNDING!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
juliosantos Newbie

juliosantos

Posted
Posted

i like bradberry he has talent and potential we need him back but this is a learning year for him as well . the difference between whorley , sanchez and bradberry is bradberry has the potential , whorley and sanchez will be out of the nfl in a couple years they straight suck. we need to make another move if we are going to attempt to save this season but we probably will sign a bum at most and thats not even guaranteed . i like what i have seen from teddy he has a similar mentality as norman just doesn't have the skill set but he does look like a decent corner for the most part.  mcclain has to go he is so bad as well . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Rainmaker Newbie

The_Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, juliosantos said:

i like bradberry he has talent and potential we need him back but this is a learning year for him as well . the difference between whorley , sanchez and bradberry is bradberry has the potential , whorley and sanchez will be out of the nfl in a couple years they straight suck. we need to make another move if we are going to attempt to save this season but we probably will sign a bum at most and thats not even guaranteed . i like what i have seen from teddy he has a similar mentality as norman just doesn't have the skill set but he does look like a decent corner for the most part.  mcclain has to go he is so bad as well . 

Williams has the speed and size just needs more experience, far as McClain goes he is best suited to play nickel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • louisbat1
      TARVEL

      By louisbat1 · Posted

      https://crm.ridemetro.org/forums/general-discussion/93d2fbe2-3dc1-ef11-b542-001dd80082b2
    • BullCityP
      Bryce Young PFF - Week 16

      By BullCityP · Posted

      The reality is Bryce outplayed a Probowl QB vs a better defense with inferior weapons. IDK what else you can ask for from your #1 overall pick that you gave up the farm for 
    • KSpan
      Bryce Young PFF - Week 16

      By KSpan · Posted

      Ah yes, the classic and timeless 'Big Time Throws' HOF metric. Gold star for Bryce and the other QBs that make Big Time Throws. That eyeroll aside, my position has always been that Bryce's ceiling is Bridgewater/Smith levels of effectiveness, which is not good enough to have a consistent shot at winning Super Bowls in today's NFL. My issue and concern with Bryce remains as it has always been - a lack of downfield dynamics. My position has also been that this is what really hampered the Saints with Brees at QB for the last nearly decade, the inability to truly attack downfield vs the top competition when the opportunities presented themselves. That is likely complicated somewhat by the receivers on the roster and time will continue to sort that out if the roster is effectively managed. After watching the second half yesterday there were some very good throws, chiefly the throw over the middle while taking the shot that absolutely should have been roughing and then the superbly-placed TD to Moore, but still only 10 points produced and an inability to really close it out. That complete whiff on the third down pass was an untimely mistake but the kind that happens to all QBs and I don't think that's really outside of Bryce's current range of possibilities on any given throw anyway. I chuckled at the irony given all of the 'clutch' talk recently, but that's not really here or there when assessing the throw itself. Yes, 30 points should be enough to win an NFL game, but the best teams have to be able to put up points and sustain drives when needed even if carrying an unreasonable part of the load. Getting 'close' with teams like the Chiefs and Eagles is to me more a signal of the limitations I mentioned earlier (Saints-esque inability to overcome the best competition) rather than an overly positive sign, and only time will tell if he and the team can move past that. Hopefully these final games show some increased dynamics and a continued growth toward true downfield effectiveness.
×
×
  • Create New...