Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

just going to leave this here

luke nukem

By luke nukem,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

R0CKnR0LLA Proficient

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Hunter Henry is legit.

This is who I wanted in the 1st round, he's posted 290 yards in his last 4 games and also a very good blocker. Can only imagine the matchup nightmare we'd create pairing him with Olsen in 2 TE sets.

But instead we drafted a backup DT to play minimum snaps and then get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPantherKing Grand Master

CPantherKing

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Hunter Henry is legit.

 

11 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

This is who I wanted in the 1st round, he's posted 290 yards in his last 4 games and also a very good blocker. Can only imagine the matchup nightmare we'd create pairing him with Olsen in 2 TE sets.

But instead we drafted a backup DT to play minimum snaps and then get hurt.

 

Could have been running a 2 TE set on 3rd down. Hunter Henry has a 73.1% catch percentage. The Panthers need a 3rd option on 3rd and 5+ outside of Olsen and KB who can get quick separation off the LoS. Funchess, Brown, and Ginn can not manage to replace Cotchery's role. Who would have thought those 3 receivers have unreliable hands?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Veteran

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

This is who I wanted in the 1st round, he's posted 290 yards in his last 4 games and also a very good blocker. Can only imagine the matchup nightmare we'd create pairing him with Olsen in 2 TE sets.

But instead we drafted a backup DT to play minimum snaps and then get hurt.

I know, it makes me sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
brandon_87 Newbie

brandon_87

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

lol won't even be suprised if rivers manages to dump 800 yards on this garbage heap of a secondary.

Lol don't go getting all dramatic, this isn't the rivers of 2010, this is 2016, he's horrible now, only puts up yards when they are down and forced to throw

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cptx Rising Star

cptx

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

Lol don't go getting all dramatic, this isn't the rivers of 2010, this is 2016, he's horrible now, only puts up yards when they are down and forced to throw

Soooo what you're saying is Panthers will manage to have the lead in the 4th and he will shred them FTW?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Proficient

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

Lol don't go getting all dramatic, this isn't the rivers of 2010, this is 2016, he's horrible now, only puts up yards when they are down and forced to throw

as we speak Rivera is coming up with an ingenious gameplan to never have a lead in the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...