Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What was different with the offense in the second half?


KSpan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

They allowed Cam to run the no huddle. Lined up with 15 seconds+ on the play clock. Allowed Cam to look over the defense and make adjustments.

Better than getting play call in late and breaking huddle only to have 3 to 5 seconds to read the defense.

Exactly.. cam was allowed to be cam for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We did use the hurry up and Cam was throwing in rhythm and to spots.  In the first half he was holding the ball and waiting for receivers to uncover.  We used the run more effectively and kept them off balance.  I promise you when we were only behind by 7 I promise you they werent playing prevent.  But as wide open as their receivers were most of the day you would think we were. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

Exactly.. cam was allowed to be cam for once.

Wrong again.  THey ran the no huddle and Cam got in rhythm and did a great job.  Other games we have run the no huddle and went 3 and out which puts more pressure on the defense if they have been out on the field all day.  It isnt doing or not doing it, it is doing what works.  If it doesnt we try other things and if it does we keep doing it.   Cam runs this offense and it is built around stop.  The notion that he cant do what he wants is really beyond stupid. You act like Shula does thing to stop the offense on purpose and hold Cam back.  That is just beyond ridiculous.  You have to know that he wants Cam to do great and will do everything he can to do that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean.....his guy has to be someone willing to come so Geno Smith is out. If you mean RUSSELL Wilson, that is laughable. Fields and ZACH Wilson are just basically the beginning of the end. These aren't likely to be Geno Smith turnarounds. Fields is further proving that he just isn't much more than a gimmick player. Zach Wilson still probably needs a year or two under some better circumstances before I would consider him a candidate for being a turnaround. He is just jumping straight back into the NY Jets fire here. 
    • This is factually incorrect. He was a two time Pro Bowler with the Rams and in fact statistically he was better with the Rams in his best season there than he has been with the Lions(could change with this season). Some of his per game stats have creeped into being marginally better with the Lions but there have not been dramatic differences in his play, actually. The biggest reason that McVay and he ended up splitting was McVay didn't think he could win a title with Goff. TBH.....so far he was 100% correct. Stafford almost immediately won them a SB and Goff in a historic run was about 70% of the reason the Lions faltered in the NFC championship game. He missed critical throws all over the first half and throughout the second half that he normally wouldn't. He choked. So, until Goff actually does win a SB...McVay has been right.
    • they have the best defense they've had in a long time...probably the best in the reid/mahommes era.  but i think they are probably the most beatable they've been in a while as well. record doesn't exactly bear that out, but they just don't look as strong on offense as they usually do. lots of reasons for that, like trying to build chemistry with newer receivers, but right now they just aren't as frightening as they typically are. i mean they'll probably win tomorrow, but i don't see them as the strongest team in the AFC right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...