Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Whose job is more in jeopardy? Rivera's or Gettleman's?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

As much as i love and appreciate JR, and as much as i know Gettleman SHOULD be fired, he wont be.  Thats not how JR does business.  He is methodical and measured.  If he were to fire Gettleman or Rivera, especially during the season, i would be shocked.  It's just not in his history.

If you're asking me who i think shoupd be fired, and I had to pick one...  it's hands down, without a doubt, happily and gleefully, Gettleman.  If youre asking who i think of the two would be more likely to get canned, it would be Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

GMs and head coaches going 4-12 one season removed from the Super Bowl is without precedent though.

Because they don't do what Gettleman did. Richard Sherman got his cash and Julio won't sniff 300 yards today because of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

GMs and head coaches going 4-12 one season removed from the Super Bowl is without precedent though.

That would be incorrect:

Super Bowl losing teams who went on to poor follow–up performance include:[3]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman has lucked into a lot of his success. Some of his signings were head scratchers but they turned out to play well, which fed his ego and made him think he could keep putting poo out on the field and get away with it. . The crucial decisions this off season, he failed on every single one of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not Rivera's fault in anyway shape or form.. the problems we have are not coaching (Shula is in the convo though).. the problems we are having is personnel/depth.. Our O-line is a swiss cheese and I wouldn't bet on our DBs squad against any other teams Practice squad WRs.. Like seriously.. Our DEs are not getting it done - and the entire fanbase knew this coming into the season.. O-line, D-line and DBs.. it is 100% on Gettleman..

With that said, im not ready to get rid of him.. he deserves another offseason to correct his gawd aweful mistakes and redeem himself.. he needs to cash in all the credit we gave him the past 3 years to not get fired though.. he is at a EVEN +/- in my book now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OldNorthPowell said:

Shula should of been gone and I would lean toward Gettleman right now. I think Ron is still a good coach but Gettleman did him no favors in the off season.


How is Ron a good head coach ? He has 2 winning seasons out of 5 on his way to another losing season. This is nothing new under Ron we always start of slow. Ron should be fired

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

That would be incorrect:

Super Bowl losing teams who went on to poor follow–up performance include:[3]

Not one of those went 15-1. And 1 of the 3 teams to go 5-11 or worse did fire their coach: the Raiders fired Bill Callahan after the '03 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...