Charles Tillman says he doesn't see the Chemistry in Carolina's Secondary

[Saca312]

On Fox 11:00am segment, Charles weighed in his two cents on the Panthers secondary and the defense's state of mind. He mentions how he believes he doesn't see the chemistry he saw last year. He says it is a fixable situation, stating extracirricular bonding activities would help the secondary trememdously. He says the secondary needs to start developing as a unit, and being comfortable with each other.

I agree with this statement. I think the Panthers have lost a lot of mojo and swag from last year, and the missed assignments and lackluster performance proves it. This is fixable with time and getting used to the system, but if we are to be competitive this season, we need to shore it up back there. Especially with the Falcons (yet again) having a strong start.

[FuFuLamePoo]

No wonder.  Three of them are rookies just getting their feet wet hoping not to screw up that bad.  No one has played together before

[truthjuice]

This is why vet presence is so important. 

[t96]

I think Bradberry, Worley and Sanchez together would have the most chemistry. Can't see how any of them would have great chemistry with McClain or Teddy, and understand how the rookies wouldn't have had great chemistry with Bene though not sure that was a factor in his release. Honestly think our secondary will be fine once Bradberry's back and if we move Coleman back to FS and once Griffin gets up to speed to play SS.

[YoungPanthers89]

Uh yeah no poo

[Proudiddy]

Gee, i wonder what wouldve caused that...

[Ship]

yeah, as said above, Bradberry is legit. people wanna be down on the secondary because of no vets and no josh, but Bradberry has done very well and is going to become a legit shutdown guy sooner rather than later. his injury was a huge factor in the ATL game and his absence now is huge.

imagine losing josh for a stretch of games last year. that's basically what is happening right now.

in general this board is down on bradberry for a variety of reasons, we have a blind spot right now on him. he's a stud, he can be there physically with anyone on the field. we need him back soon.

[pantherclaw]

I believe the loss of Peanut, hurts more than the loss of Norman. 

Hate that we lost Peanut to a knee injury. 

I also don't believe that there was another Peanut like DB available, that we could have added.

[mc52beast]

Maybe if our d-line could get close enough to opposing qb's to at least smell their deodorant our secondary wouldn't be such a mess

[Daddy_Uncle]

this is a no poo statement. But the three rookies and Coleman spent a great deal of time together during the offseason bonding

[cptx]

Well we have different starters every game so I guess it's to be expected.

[AceBoogie]

That's because most of them are still going through puberty 

[WOW!!]

Thanks Gettelmen 

[WOW!!]

2 hours ago, Ship said:

yeah, as said above, Bradberry is legit. people wanna be down on the secondary because of no vets and no josh, but Bradberry has done very well and is going to become a legit shutdown guy sooner rather than later. his injury was a huge factor in the ATL game and his absence now is huge.

imagine losing josh for a stretch of games last year. that's basically what is happening right now.

in general this board is down on bradberry for a variety of reasons, we have a blind spot right now on him. he's a stud, he can be there physically with anyone on the field. we need him back soon.

Imagine if Bradberry was the 2nd CB and you still had Josh signed to his tender...hmmmmm