Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should have spent some $...


Jmac

Recommended Posts

I thought D G had the right formula for this team, I was wrong. This season proves to me (and hopefully him), that you have to spend the dough and keep upgrading personal where needed. You also need a seasoned vet or two for the rookies to depend on for guidance.

I bought the bargain basement line when the money was not there, but to have and not to spend wisely to upgrade is wrong. Dave seems like a smart guy and after watching this shat storm on the field he sees the error in his ways.

One or two rookies mixed with vet talent (who can still play), is worth the investment. Kills me to see the Panthers in this shape and spiraling downward fast. We will see what the philosiphy will be next season......when there is actually players on the market worth signing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rhyslloyd said:

Excellent. Another redundant thread with opinions that have already been discussed and points made in numerous other threads. Gotta get a little limelight I reckon.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

How about not responding if this distubs you so much and let others who actually wish to have a discussion about it do so. Who the hell are you anyways to decide what any thread should be about. Only thing redundant is people like you with their smart ass comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about not responding if this distubs you so much and let others who actually wish to have a discussion about it doi so. Who the hell are you anyways to decide what any thread should be about. Only thing redundant is people like you with their smart ass comments.



It's been discussed. Repeatedly. Here. Multiple times.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rhyslloyd said:

 


It's been discussed. Repeatedly. Here. Multiple times.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

So what .....you want to talk about Aleppo or the State of the Union? This is a football forum. I am not on here all day to follow every thread. I had an opinion and I wanted feedback.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you.  I had faith in Gettleman's judgement on the Norman situation at the time; even as weird as that whole scenario played out.  Hindsight has been very unkind to Gettleman (Norman best corner in football, our secondary the worst unit in football).  

It's one of those situations where, no matter how much good Gettleman might have done before, can be the one that defines him.  We will see how he goes about fixing this problem.  Will have to wait until the off-season to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best guess is that Gettleman spent a lot of time thinking about who on our team we want to resign, and i'm hoping he felt that the unused cap space from this year will allow us to do that.  We will see.

You also dont want him to just spend for the sake of spending.  Maybe there wasnt a FA out there that was either willing to come to us, a  good fit for us, or wasnt worth what he got paid elsewhere.  Patience is a virtue.

At 1-4, i'm not gonna sit here and say that we did all the right things with our spending, but saving our money for when he time is right might have been the logic.  It is fair to disagree with the decision, but maybe that helps people who dont understand the reasoning behind it.  With the cap, you have to take some chances on some positions, and we havent been very lucky.  Our schedule, missed field goals, injuries to our QB, RB, CB, and offensive line shuffling probably havent helped.  All of those things add up.  

What i will say is that we've had chances to win games that dont require us having Josh Norman in order to get it done.  We are not making a lot of the little plays we made last year, which covered a lot up.  I wish we had a DE that was more explosive off the edge and a solid CB at a fair price, but i cant name any off the top of my head that were available that i think would change our misfortune when you consider all of our missed opportunities across the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...