Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton has unmasked this entire football team.


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

It's tough to quantify things like credit and blame. You can't bake a cake and take back the eggs. How do you assign credit and blame in an interlocking, mutually-inclusive system where success in one area is built upon success in another? You can't, which is what makes assigning responsibility for losses so elusive in most cases. Is it scheme? Is it execution? How do you judge the one against the other when they're both contingent factors?

Cam Newton's injury has removed a shroud that's been covering the team for the past year and a half. His absence has revealed several things with unadulterated clarity:

1) Mike Shula is terrible and was only ever good because he had Cam as a quarterback. Judging coordinators is as elusive a prospect as any, but those three gut-runs with the game on the line are the types of qualitative data you can actually use. Scheme aside, that's evidence of god-awful situational playcalling. It was there last year, but Cam's excellence on top of lucky breaks masked it. Mike Shula has to go.

2) Ron Rivera is a below-average head coach situationally. He is an above-average leader of men and developer of character, which is important in a coach and should not be undervalued, but he's always made poor decisions when the heat's on. Cam Newton's excellence as a quarterback has kept him out of many of those defining moments, but Ron is not strong enough as a head coach to help mask deficiencies in scheme or personnel, which is what good coaches do. Ron Rivera needs to be heavily evaluated moving forward.

3) Derek Anderson is awesome... as a backup. He's never been starting material and he never will be. The Great White Hope might be scruffy and steely-eyed and businesslike and carry a mean lunch pail, but when the game's on the line he makes questionable throws. Cam Newton makes everyone around him better, Derek Anderson is a really, really good backup quarterback who's well-liked and can be relied upon for a few plays. Derek Anderson needs to work on his decision-making so he won't turn the ball over next time he subs for the reigning MVP.

4) Dave Gettleman is an excellent general manager but he committed a huge judgement error in our secondary. He was dealt a tough hand with a ton of guys coming up for retirement, and I get the Norman situation cap-wise, but those aren't the problem. Rolling into the season with our current personnel without properly testing them was the problem. Assuming the pass rush would make up for their lack of experience was the problem. Cam Newton's transcendent talent was good enough to mask deficiencies last year and his absence now is exposing the roster as woefully insufficient to compete. Dave Gettleman needs to serious consider some bye-week trades if he wants his team to be viable in November.

 

The good news is I had to try to come up with more than four bullet points and it was a stretch. There's a ton of talent on this team. The offensive line is pretty awesome, our backs are okay considering Stew's been out, our receiving corps is world-class, and we've got a good defensive core to work with. The bad news is that Cam's absence has exposed our biggest weaknesses as our very foundations, and those are both the hardest things to convince people to address and the most difficult things to replace.

A good start would be firing Mike Shula tomorrow morning. If that happens I think Cam rolls back in this week, prepares the team, elevates their play, and leads us to a win against New Orleans. Here's to hoping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess i'm the last person on this board still defending Shula.  It wasn't but a year ago he orchestrated the NFL's top scoring offense with Ted Ginn JR. as the top WR.  

There were 4 inexcusable, egregious turnovers tonight, and maybe only for one he was even partially to blame.  If we had a healthy Cam we would have had no issue putting 30+ on the scoreboard.

 

 

Gano has become a problem, it should be mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

The question becomes who do you replace him with. I'm assuming Proehl.

But reality is I don't see Rivera firing Shula.

Dorsey.. and yes rivera will not fire him now not after all of the other times he clearly should have fired him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

This FO if far too loyal when it shouldn't be. Shula needs to go without question. We went from an unstoppable offense to one of the most inept, predictable, poo shows in the NFL. You can only get better when you admit you have a problem. Shula is our problem. 

FO doesn't hire and fire coaches.

Rivera does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why fire Shula? He called a fine game. If DA doesn't float it into double coverage or if he secures the ball, we have virtually a 100% chance of winning. The two three runs up the gut drives did totally suck ass though (coincidentally our first and last drives). I don't know how that last 3rd down wasn't a play action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between 1-2, Panthers fans need to just call it how it is

Ron is not a good HC. He's not. He's had 2 winning seasons, the years Gettle made player acquisitions. That makes it clear, we win cause of the players not the coaches. He refuses to make coaching changes when he should, like now because frankly he doesn't know who to turn to and put his trust in. Your title is what people on here been saying for a while now on the offensive side of things, Cam Newton and without him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beastson said:

Between 1-2, Panthers fans need to just call it how it is

Ron is not a good HC. He's not. He's had 2 winning seasons, the years Gettle made player acquisitions. That makes it clear, we win cause of the players not the coaches. He refuses to make coaching changes when he should, like now because frankly he doesn't know who to turn to and put his trust in. Your title is what people on here been saying for a while now on the offensive side of things, Cam Newton and without him...

 

Yep there's a reason why he was nearly fired twice..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...