Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You a talker or a texter?


pstall

Recommended Posts

I have gotten to the point now i will just text you. It's quick, concise and to the point . If you call and don't leave a vm i don't bother replying. You do leave a vm then i text my answer.  Lol

I got friends who after 2 texts just have to call and I'm like come on man.

What says the Huddle?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definite texter. Talking? With my phone? What's that about? 

That would be like putting a clock on your phone so you don't have to look at a wrist watch, then making smart watches for your wrist so you don't have to look at your phone. It's insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old school here. I prefer talking. I have seen way too many people get upset by text messages that were meant to be funny but sarcasm doesn't come across a text very well sometimes. I also know of people who will say something blatantly mean on text and when called out on it they go with "I was just kidding" or something similar. I do text some but if the conversation goes much beyond just giving facts or info I dial the number just so everything is clear. If that person doesn't pick up or worse, tries to continue texting, they get no reply from me until they call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, pstall said:

Unless I'm walking someone thru removing a brain tumor or landing a plane because the pilot passed out,  I don't see what can be so hard to understand that we need a table for 5 and to order me a Copper before I get there.

Alot easier to text a aircraft then talking on the radio. Less distracting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His o loaded with swift, dj, Keenan and Rome was inconsistent at best. The d was bad. And the game management was atrocious and lost them games.  He was terrible and made the team worse. I wish they kept him
    • That is my point.  I think teams make a huge mistake when they pay their decent to average QBs top QB money because they feel that they have to match the market or lose their investment--There is no way, for example, that Tua or Prescott or Murray should all be making more than Mahomes--I mean, Dak makes $15m per season more than Mahomes. People say, "Well, when its his turn...." But that is not how it should be--so my point was that Bryce can be doing mediocre to good enough in 2 years, but the way it is going, you have to pay him at the starting QB rate--currently $60m.  So even if you think he will continue to improve, at $60 m, he would eliminate any chance for a ring---so my view is, if he is not elite, you cut him.  So you draft QBs now and see what you can make of them.
    • With two 4ths and three 5ths I’m hoping we can kill it on adding depth. Take a gamble with the two 7ths.  First 3 picks id love to address the defense. I expect Tuttle, Robinson, and Jewell to all be on the 2025 roster but not after that. Be a good time to add depth and let them develop a year.  
×
×
  • Create New...