Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You think the panthers have it bad with refs?? think again

Toolbox

By Toolbox,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted

Pryor's taunting penalty in week 2 or 3, I think, was also pretty questionable. He was clearly flipping the ball to the ref and it landed on a fallen DB and he got called for taunting as they were in the red zone looking to tie or win with 10 seconds left in the 4th quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

Yeah the norman bow and arrow which wasn't even directed at a person got flagged??? and I thought the NBA was bad with the dumb fouls you can get just for laughing on the bench.. lol wtf is going on with professional sports?

The NFL wants to project an image of distinctiveness and classiness while they have guys on their rosters who abuse women and children

also they want the teams with the most established heritages to be more successful 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Toolbox said:

Also the play was not reviewed and given back to the browns.. so yeah fug you NFL.

OK, I'm not sayin...

But the tiny official in the huge hat that signaled Redskins ball?

That's the NFL token female official right?

Like I said, I'm just sayin'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

The NFL wants to project an image of distinctiveness and classiness while they have guys on their rosters who abuse women and children

also they want the teams with the most established heritages to be more successful 

Yes.

And you forgot they want to turn Cam Newton's brain into jelly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toolbox Contributor

Toolbox

Posted
  • Author
Posted
35 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

OK, I'm not sayin...

But the tiny official in the huge hat that signaled Redskins ball?

That's the NFL token female official right?

Like I said, I'm just sayin'...

Yikes I never noticed it was that lady ref..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...