Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

6-3


unicar15

Recommended Posts

I actually don't disagree that these are games we should probably win, though KC is a lot better than the final score last night.

 

Ultimately though, I really don't know if I feel this organization has really earned success. The inherent problems in our philosophy have really damaged us this season, and when the criticisms that we haven't beaten anybody start inevitably rolling in, it'll be hard to say that it won't be deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to somehow find our swagger. No babying and coddling. Own up to your mistakes, be better at your position and make it gel. After the butt kicking yesterday, Cam and TD going down, they have to come out and have a good week of practice and play a pissed off game. They need to be able to feed off of each other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No pass rush. Safeties are trash. And corners who can't be expected to cover long enough. Yep 6-3 seems legit SMH. Winston Brees and Palmer will tear us a new one! How slow did our secondary look last night? Then you got martin, cooks, johnson and all there crew. Seriously if we get to 7-9 at this point with the pure putrid that's wearing the uniform in certain positions I'd celebrate like its the new millennium.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...