The NFC looks as weak as it's been in years

[MVPccaffrey]

All is not lost, if we can get things together.  Even if it's just making the playoffs as a wildcard.

 

If the "best" team in the conference is Minnesota with a Bradford run offense, or Philadelphia led by a rookie QB, or Atlanta with their suspect defense -- today not withstanding -- then that is as weak as it gets since the mid-late 2000s.  Those aren't teams you have to be terrified about heading to their place in the post-season.

[The_Rainmaker]

Just now, Camvp said:

All is not lost, if we can get things together.  Even if it's just making the playoffs as a wildcard.

 

If the "best" team in the conference is Minnesota with a Bradford run offense, or Philadelphia led by a rookie QB, or Atlanta with their suspect defense -- today not withstanding -- then that is as weak as it gets since the mid-late 2000s.  Those aren't teams you have to be terrified about heading to their place in the post-season.

Your forgetting Seahawks 

[Sam Mills Fan]

I disagree. Just because the teams leading the division aren't the teams the pundits picked before the season doesn't make them weak. People were calling the NFC weak when we ran over it and the league last year; I'd like to think they were wrong and we were just that damn good.

[frash.exe]

The NFC was pure poo in 2004

[stirs]

Panthers and Cards were supposed to be the class of NFC, both with only one win.

Eagles unbeaten, were picked for last place.

It's the NFL, only the Browns are a constant