Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Remmers was our highest graded Offensive Player


Rags

Recommended Posts

85.7 and was the best olineman that game.

He's been much improved this season, even handling Miller one on one a few times this season.

I wish I could say the same about the tackle on the other side. Since his extension, he's look like he's regressed, though it might just be the better competition he's faced. 

Can we please stop acting like Remmers is the problem? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rags said:

85.7 and was the best olineman that game.

He's been much improved this season, even handling Miller one on one a few times this season.

I wish I could say the same about the tackle on the other side. Since his extension, he's look like he's regressed, though it might just be the better competition he's faced. 

Can we please stop acting like Remmers is the problem? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yaboychris28 said:

A broken clock is right twice a day.. Jokes aside though, Remmers is more than serviceable against any defender that's not a speed rusher. If griffin was on his side, I'm sure he would have had 1-2 bad moments. He did play well though

Hunter is a speed rusher tho.

 

A young and growing one but, still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

I take PFF grading with a grain of salt. Also when it comes to evaluating our lineman you need grade with curve since we do more max protect than any other team in the league. The fact that we are second in sacks and first in QB hits speaks volumes

We also have played two of the best pass rushing defenses with two of the best pass rushers in the league.

 

I'm not saying Remmers isn't upgradeable, he is, but there are bigger problems on our o-line, and out offense, than Remmers. He's an above average RT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Rags said:

We also have played two of the best pass rushing defenses with two of the best pass rushers in the league.

 

I'm not saying Remmers isn't upgradeable, he is, but there are bigger problems on our o-line, and out offense, than Remmers. He's an above average RT

Outside of Turner and Kalil none of our linemen are above average. If they were we wouldn't need to sacrifice receiving threats as pass blockers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rags said:

85.7 and was the best olineman that game.

He's been much improved this season, even handling Miller one on one a few times this season.

I wish I could say the same about the tackle on the other side. Since his extension, he's look like he's regressed, though it might just be the better competition he's faced. 

Can we please stop acting like Remmers is the problem? 

Anomly , otherwise Remmers is pretty much Turnstile when we play against playoff caliber teams. Hopefully he gets injured & coches are froced to play Daryl Williams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rags said:

We also have played two of the best pass rushing defenses with two of the best pass rushers in the league.

 

I'm not saying Remmers isn't upgradeable, he is, but there are bigger problems on our o-line, and out offense, than Remmers. He's an above average RT

Man, I hate auto correct. For example, it must have made horrible RT somehow read above average RT.  First world problems I guess....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's some big assumptions in here - first, I think Canales HAS helped Bryce a poo ton. To pretend he hasn't is asinine. Has he fixed him?  I mean, the dude looks like he could perhaps be a backup or low-end starter now, whereas he looked like he didn't belong in the NFL a year ago. You're talking about a coach that brought one of the worst NFL QBs of all time to a point where he may actually be a low-end starter. That IS impressive. Second, the bolded. Come on - given the offense, the dude is far from "trending towards bust." He definitely needs work but he's shown an impressive ability to get open. He's contributing to an anemic offense. The dude is our leading receiver (though he'll be #2 in yardage by end of season by a little, as Thielen does better per game).  As to his coaching, he had this team competing and believing against 3 of the better teams in the NFL, despite the lack of talent, and despite our QB situation.  Yes, things fell apart vs DAL, and he was outcoached. But that will happen with young coaches IMO.  I don't think it indicates he cant' be better. The idea of "pulling off the bandage" is ridiculous. Who would want to coach here if we fired this guy after one season? 
    • Whatever they are in totality the cowboys are beat up all to hell on both sides of the ball and even that was too much for lil Bryce to overcome.  Bryce defenders have to hype up every other team and trash every other part of the panthers just because of the situation they’ve put themselves in. 
    • JB had a first round grade in the eyes of a lot scouts based on HIS TALENT LEVEL. If not for the injury he would have gone higher in the draft, possibly between the middle and the end of round 1. To get him just before the 50th pick is a steal. He'd be on a 4 year deal. You can't even renegotiate until the end of the season 3. You're basically paying him nothing for 3 seasons. I don't buy into all back are interchangeable. No they're not. You have average backs, good backs, then your great-exceptional backs. The latter category doesn't grow on trees. If a back is special it pays to keep them. The key is knowing the difference between the first two categories and the third one.
×
×
  • Create New...