Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Get rid of Tre Boston


t96

Get rid of Tre Boston?  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Get rid of Tre Boston?

    • Yes, cut him
    • No, keep him but bench his ass
    • No, he's a beast and should be our starter


Recommended Posts

I agree that Boston shouldn't be starting out there, but he's a good back up. Haha at cutting him because of his views. Incredibly selfish on your end...he's allowed to take a stand. Also, if you cut him now, I'd guarenteed many players would give the organization the side eye and there'd be a few disgruntled players. I'd imagine there's a few in that locker room who feels like Tre. Cut him now, and this team spirals out of control. Cutting him now would be one of the worst moves you could make, and bring even more pressure to the team. Media would have a field day with this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, truthjuice said:

He kneeled or something? He said he's gonna protest? He's just not s starting player. He's nice for a series or two. 

Didn't do anything today, but he said he and a few others got something planned for next week. Said he's not going to let two weeks pass without doing something. I guess his conscious won't allow it. 

So, off top, there's others who feels like him. You cut him, then you piss those guys off, and no telling who he's got participating with him. Trai Turner seems like that kind of guy. I called Boston being the person on our team to do something. I see it in Turner as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...