Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What a disaster


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

But the huddle will say he isn't needed..

I don't think anyone has ever said we don't need a good pass-rushing DE.

I have, however, seen a lot of people (correctly) say that good pass-rushing DE will NOT be he who shall not be named.

Anyone thinking differently is the one who is delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

I don't think anyone has ever said we don't need a good pass-rushing DE.

I have, however, seen a lot of people (correctly) say that good pass-rushing DE will NOT be he who shall not be named.

Anyone thinking differently is the one who is delusional.

I was specifically talking about Hardy and not anyone else so I was correct in my statement saying the The huddle will say he is not needed..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

I don't think anyone has ever said we don't need a good pass-rushing DE.

I have, however, seen a lot of people (correctly) say that good pass-rushing DE will NOT be he who shall not be named.

Anyone thinking differently is the one who is delusional.

Well hopefully gettleman either trades or nabs a elite DE in FA.. but we also need a damn OT as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

I don't think anyone has ever said we don't need a good pass-rushing DE.

I have, however, seen a lot of people (correctly) say that good pass-rushing DE will NOT be he who shall not be named.

Anyone thinking differently is the one who is delusional.

Anyone that still believes viable DE help is coming from the tooth fairy is far more delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldNorthPowell said:

Well I put about 80% of the blame on Mike Shula for not mixing it up and letting the Vikings tee off on Cam Newton all game. No quick passes, no slants, and runs up the middle over and over.

Just shula being shula.. he will never change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...