Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hawkins over D Williams?

t96

By t96,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

Shocker to me. Is the staff this down on Williams or what? He's a bruiser of a run blocker and of course needs a lot of work in pass pro, but still figured he'd be ahead of Hawkins. Especially at RT, his better and more natural position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Rainmaker Newbie

The_Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Shocker to me. Is the staff this down on Williams or what? He's a bruiser of a run blocker and of course needs a lot of work in pass pro, but still figured he'd be ahead of Hawkins. Especially at RT, his better and more natural position.

Yea Hawkins got  blow up on that play , rather have Williams out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

I don't understand how Daryl looked so good last offseason that he might've taken Remmers job and was showing all this promise up until this year. This year according to the coaches, he has regressed and can't even beat out a journeyman for the backup role. He's either really lazy, ala Jeff Otah, or the coaches aren't doing something right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

Hell, weren't they giving Williams looks at both RT and LT last year in camp? That doesn't sound like a guy who ends up at OG. But, if that's the decision it's the decision. Either way, we need to find a way to upgrade the OT spot. Oher is on the wrong side of 30 and Remmers is a JAG. Doesn't look like Williams will be the answer we hoped for, but that's not exactly unexpected. Not many starting OTs are found in the 4th round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...