Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just noticed something pretty damning about the refs


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

On the personal foul that was finally called for the head shot to cam, the ref that was standing right there the whole time looking at it was not the one that threw a flag.. he just stood there and looked the whole time.. he did not give a one fug about what just happened.

 

airojbw5tvsddvgzse1n.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thought it was worth mentioning since we all was focused on the hit itself to notice what the refs were doing.. just watching the replays of the game and I noticed how the ref just didn't a give a 2 shits about what just had happened to cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 15 said:

the day you realize that there is nothing you can do about it and discussing the past only pisses you off more, will be the day you find peace. 

100% correct.

 

 

 

i however, am not looking for peace.  I want revenge/justice/change/blood.

Im not ready to just move along, I want some fugging action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toolbox said:

Just thought it was worth mentioning since we all was focused on the hit itself to notice what the refs were doing.. just watching the replays of the game and I noticed how the ref just didn't a give a 2 shits about what just had happened to cam.

Zod posted a pick of the ref right there for that bs ball spot as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 15 said:

the day you realize that there is nothing you can do about it and discussing the past only pisses you off more, will be the day you find peace. 

you live in a world where keeping something as a collective talking point will lead to actual action if the crowd is big enough. The crowd is currently big enough and loud enough. Now is no time for peace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...