Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick Funchess Question Pertaining to the Season Opener...


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So the season opener starts this Thursday, and I'm pumped. I feel like with Funchess' improvement and KB back, we'll have more opportunities on offense, and it'll be a different game from last year. 

Now, how much of a factor will Funchess be this game? I'm thinking he's going to be Cam's prime target just because of his ability to win battles against corners, route running, and how Denver will likely account for Kelvin more than Funchess.

Like say for example you're in a fantasy league and you have WRs Allen Robinson, Mike Evans, and Marvin Jones as potential starters, but you still have Funchess as your dark horse in your belt. Would you start Funchess over one of these players if he were to make that much of an impact? Or do you think Funchess will make an impact, but not in a way that'll make flashy Fantasy points compared to the other receivers.

Any thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Funchess will be a factor personally. KB still looked rusty last game.  Funchess and to a lesser degree Philly are our two most physical receivers after Kelvin.   Matching physicality will be important considering our opponent.

According to Rotoworld (via Charlotte Observer) KB should be playing around 35 snaps so that's barely more than half on average.  We averaged just under 67 snaps last year.

I wouldn't start him over Evans or robinson though.  Jones is a toss up.  I think Golden Tate is still the alpha dog up there.

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9321/kelvin-benjamin

The Charlotte Observer reports the Panthers plan to play Kelvin Benjamin "around 35 snaps" Week 1 against the Broncos.
Benjamin was limited all preseason with conditioning issues as he attempts to return from a torn ACL, and it does not sound like he is all the way back yet. Carolina rotated Devin Funchess in plenty with the first-team behind Benjamin and Ted Ginn in the third preseason game, and he will likely play big snaps Week 1 as well. Against a top defense with an uncertain workload, it will be tough to trust any Carolina receiver Week 1. Sep 3 - 8:45 AM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the thing that often gets missed is the coaching valuation. I think this staff relies on vets a tad too much at times and holds guys back occasionally. Obviously they want to give the vets a chance to prove themselves and as DG said "everybody gets 2 years to prove it".

 

What will hinder Funchess more than anything this season imo is RR and Shula's hesitation to line him up over Ginn. I still like Ginn, but I really think Funchess would do a better job than him stretching the defense vertically just because he reduces risk when being thrown at. His hands vice grip that ball, it's crazy. Top ten value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are going to score a lot of points in this game period.  Well, unless we force several turnovers.  I don't expect either team to break 20 points and I don't think our receivers will show much at all.  The main thing our offense as a whole has to do is avoid the mistakes that plagued us in the SB.  Do that, and we win a defensive struggle. 

 

That being said, I do think that our receivers will show us something this year, just not in this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Saca312 said:

So the season opener starts this Thursday, and I'm pumped. I feel like with Funchess' improvement and KB back, we'll have more opportunities on offense, and it'll be a different game from last year. 

Now, how much of a factor will Funchess be this game? I'm thinking he's going to be Cam's prime target just because of his ability to win battles against corners, route running, and how Denver will likely account for Kelvin more than Funchess.

Like say for example you're in a fantasy league and you have WRs Allen Robinson, Mike Evans, and Marvin Jones as potential starters, but you still have Funchess as your dark horse in your belt. Would you start Funchess over one of these players if he were to make that much of an impact? Or do you think Funchess will make an impact, but not in a way that'll make flashy Fantasy points compared to the other receivers.

Any thoughts?

 

Well fantasy football impact and real football impact are different. 

For example, a 2003 Prohel type year.  Impactful in reality not stat sheet wise.

I could see him this year with about 800 yards and 8 TDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did my fantasy draft tonight to win instead of just picking all Panthers like I always do and losing so I nabbed Funch in like the 11th round, while KB was taken in the 3rd round. Very possible Funch ends up the better fantasy player this year with defenses keying in on KB and Funch being so versatile. And I got him around 96 picks after KB. Actually was the only Panther I got this year since people went outrageous and took Cam in the first (I never go QB that early), Olsen in the 2nd (I was going to take him pretty early as my TE but 2nd was too early), KB in the 3rd as I said, our D in the 5th or so (I don't go D until after round 10 and used to always be able to get our D), and Stew in the 5th (PPR, no way I'd take Stew that early. Got Carlos Hyde and Ryan Mathews in the 6th and 7th and frankly those two will probably both be better fantasy wise than Stew this year). This is a family league and I'm sure most of those guys being picked early was just to piss me off but whatever.  Oh and Gano was taken 2 rounds before Gostkowski... I picked to win but I also happened to pick all players who the Panthers don't play this year except for Hyde and Demaryius Thomas, who I only took because it was the 7th round and I won't play him week 1 vs us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...