Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers QB draft history: last QB drafted was in.....


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

.....2005 Stefan Lefors QB Louisville (4th round)

-no stats, because he never started.

2002- Randy Fasani , Stanford (4th round)

- He played in four games, going 15-44, 171 yards, 0 TDs and 4 INTs, while rushing for 95 yards. He later signed with the Buffalo Bills and New York Jets, but did not play in any regular season games.

-As of 2008 he is a police officer for the city of Roseville, Ca

2001 - Chris Weinke QB Florida State (4th round)

- jersey retired at Florida State, heisman winner, johnny unitas award

- holds NFL record for most consecutive losses in a season by a QB with 14 (too bad the lions started 4 QBs in 2008). 2-18 as a starter.

-15/26 (td/int), 62.2 QB rating.

1995 - Kerry Collins QB Penn State (1st round)

-2 pro bowls (1996,2008)

-73.8 Qb rating

- 186/179 td/int.

We have only selected 1 Qb in the first round. For some reason, we thought we could find a franchise QB in the 4th round, sure you can do it, but after the first 2 times........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what i dont get is why the scouts couldn't pick out a good QB. 1 out of 4 (kerry collins) that is capable of winning the nfl. and why the hell they are afraid to pick one up early is beyond me. I understand we have good players that we have picked up in those earlier rounds, but I know good and well we could have done better. The only reason I bring it up, is because we have to go through this again this offseason. Unless of course, Matt moore, AJ Feely, or some other half-a** Qb is the Qb of the future. (sorry about calling Matt Moore out. it happens)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using a high pick on a QB is arguably the biggest crap shoot in the entire league. Guess wrong, and you might set your franchise back for years (many teams have, and on QBs that were considered "can't miss").

Whether you agree with the "mid-level free agent" route that Fox prefers or not, there is a certain logic to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
×
×
  • Create New...