Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns cutting Paul Kruger


SCP

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mvp2014 said:

yeah but neither came from the Browns. 

Yea and the fact that he comes from Cleveland doesn't matter at all. That's like saying that we shouldn't have drafted Vernon Butler and James Bradberry because neither played in the SEC. If he's a good fit, then he's a good fit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

Next years draft is loaded with edge rushers already. Its be interesting if Bosa goes because hell almost certainly lose money.

 

And Leonard Fournette will probably be there too but I'll let Jeremy start that train.

How are we going to pick these guys if we're picking at 32nd in 2017?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

I would be all for this. 

But will the Browns have any 3-4 pass rushers left?

Sheard, Mingo, and now Kruger gone? Wow.

If they're cutting all these guys they must've felt like they didn't have any in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AppHeel said:

Yea and the fact that he comes from Cleveland doesn't matter at all. That's like saying that we shouldn't have drafted Vernon Butler and James Bradberry because neither played in the SEC. If he's a good fit, then he's a good fit. 

Except we know they are not damaged goods.  I have trouble believing Cleveland would let go of a capable defender that could stand in on a superbowl bound team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know--they represent the entire body of players and this be determined, if it got to that point, by a vote of all veterans and rookies who are part of the union.  If the elite players are getting 50% of all cap increases, the non-elite players with shorter careers might want a bigger slice of the pie and vote accordingly.  To say that the Union would not go for it is not something I agree with--it would be the union that proposes it--based on a proposal and a majority vote.  If the veteran players vote for an equal distribution framework, then all 53 on a roster benefit from a cap increase that is applicable to the entire team.  Not sure how labor laws might be impacted...
    • Carter, Graham, or Walker and I might roll the dice hoping Walker is around later.  If Hunter is there at 8, we are about to get a really nice haul for trading back.
    • Oh well. That's his fault if he wants to eat up all the cap space and have no protection as a result. A big part of why Brady has all those rings is that he generally took team friendly deals. Not that he wasn't making a mega ass ton of money, but he wasn't leaving his team cap strapped due to his contract while Peyton Manning generally tried to negotiate for every dime he could get forcing the Colts to make tough decisions.
×
×
  • Create New...