Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Questions raised as Carolina Panthers come out flat in loss to Patriots


Ron Burgandy

Recommended Posts

Thought that was a fair article.  Every team goes into a season with question marks in the salary cap era.  The Panthers certainly had questions going into last year  (the media said we had a historically bad WR corp).  That worked out alright...

Still, hard to escape that was a dreadful offensive performance.  However, the positive as Rivera said is that it was truly much more about execution than anything.  The 2010 team executed as well as they could, but they were just overmatched.  In some ways this is more frustrating though.  The 1st string offensive line played well, especially in pass blocking.  Cam was off.  The receivers were off.  The Patriots aren't garbage either.

The defense was a major positive.  The front 7 looked dominant except for 2 throws by Brady.  The TD throw was a thing of beauty (as much as I hate him).  I am glad the Panthers start the season with a couple of lousy QB's for the secondary to gel and get some confidence.  Worley was much better outside of the opening play.  The safety situation is definitely a concern though.

The backup lines looked much better.  I (like Rivera) am disappointed the offense didn't have a better showing.  Even though the regular season offense will look a lot different with Cam as a runner, they have too much talent to go a half without scoring.  Funchess looks like he could become a legitimate #1.  KB is definitely not all the way back to what he was looking like before he got hurt.  Ginn is Ginn.  Outruns everyone last week.  Has 2 crucial drops tonight.

No need to panic because the team lacked execution tonight, not being overmatched.  I guarantee Pats fans feel a lot worse about Garrapolo tonight they we do about our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, usmcpanthers said:

Of course the charlotte observer jumps on the doom train

The sky is not falling and the season isn’t over before it begins, but the Carolina Panthers have a few things to work out before they play their regular-season opener in Denver in less than two weeks.

These are literally the first two sentences in the article.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a vanilla offense & a basic defense. We didn't game plan for New England. No Olsen, No Philly, Stewart not in long. But I was still disappointed in our WR's. I'll bet Proehl was disappointed too. And there were QB errors, too, that shouldn't have been by all three. It's basic football! Our secondary continues to disappoint also. It's not in their gut yet, too much thinking, bad tackling & bad angles. It will get better.

But, wow, what a difference between Garrapolo & Brady! The Patriots will be lucky to win any of their first 4 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also say that the refs seemed to miss a lot of calls like blocks in the back, holding, pass interference. Is that how games are going to be called this year? I hope not. Very sloppy. Did they show on TV that the ref "high fived" a Patriot player after he reversed our 2 point conversion? We were all like, WTF???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There wasn't any read option which is a huge part of our game.  Olsen sat out.  Cam must have had something else on his mind.  And we played like Crap.  Kind of like the Atlanta game.

Billicheat played his normal psychological B.S.  How Tommy boy is going to start and the Jimmy starts.  I am sure he partially game planned. (Spying Cam)

This game didn't phase me too much.  It was frustrating to lose that game because I HATE NE but it is what it is.  A B.S. pre-season game.

I do believe Norwood lost any chance of making this squad.   He didn't even look up for the ball... WTF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair article by the Observer.  I did come away from the game with a bunch of questions / issues.

1) Scifres not making this team.  Who will be our punter?

2) Safety depth is needed ASAP.

3) TE depth: We really need to see some of the young guys progress quickly.  With Greg & Ed dealing with some injuries, we need a solid #3.  I think Mucas helped himself and that we could keep 4 TEs. (Simonson & Lucas)

 

But I think we do have some answers now as well

WR battle:  KB doesn't look fully ready, and Philly has not proven his durability.  Makes me think we'll keep 6 WRs.  Assume Bersin & Byrd are #5 & #6

I'd guess RB & CB battles are over:

RBs:  Stew, Fozzy, CAP (& Tolbert)

CBs:  3 Amigos, Bene, McClain

LBs too look set.  I'm assuming Cash has won a spot.  Luke, TD, Shaq, Klein, Mayo & Cash

From where I was sitting, I had trouble seeing who we had in on the Oline Dline rotation, so for now, I can't yet comment on Oline or Dline depth, but both are somewhat less of a concern than they were 2 weeks ago.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What matters is The Denver game and the preparation for it

One thing that concerns me about Newton and that game, as I said in the game chat, is that Von Miller likes to play with Newton's head and Newton lets him do it 

In the Super bowl, a quick check down would have been his friend and I don't know if the offensive game plan doesn't have it or Newton won't do it.  Like in that game,  if the check down is there, he also needs to make that decision quicker and as best I could tell with the tv angles, it lingered last night. If was the same thing...either no safety valve planned for, no move the chains, just bombs away.

 Next, then comes expectations, the home crowd was stoked to see him.  He didn't appear stoked to see them. 

Newton's performance last night was almost like, 'I don't want to do this, I have to do this, let me try and get a xx point lead and I won't have to stay out here.'

Happens I guess when the expectation is  greatness and celebration and the result was much lesser than. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...