Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Six changes at Bank of America Stadium this season


Ron Burgandy

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

This poo is getting anoying. Im all pro i shouldnt have to see spam threads

 

 

yes it is spam. Ive know about these upgrades for months

 

what other eedundant and pointless thread is going to show up in 10 minutes? 

 

image.jpeg

It isn't any more annoying than you sig.

I actually learned something new from that article. It appears from this that the $8.50 all you can drink soda option is all that will be available

Quote

▪ Soda changes: As part of the renovations to the stadium’s 500-level, the team removed all pourable drinks from the fixed concession stands because they slow down lines by taking up a lot of space. Now fans will buy a cup at the concession stands and fill the drinks themselves at all-you-can-drink Pepsi stands. The down side? All-you-can-drink cups are $8.50. Other levels do not yet have access to the all-you-can-drink option, so they are $6.50 for a 32-oz cup, said Scott Paul, executive director of stadium operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Huddler said:

This poo is getting anoying. Im all pro i shouldnt have to see spam threads

 

 

yes it is spam. Ive know about these upgrades for months

 

what other eedundant and pointless thread is going to show up in 10 minutes? 

 

image.jpeg

I was going to say the same thing in another thread, but then I realized it was a story about helping people out by recycling cans and I didn't want to look like a douche.  I'd literally rather read a PU thread.  At least that provided entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...