Hardy?

[tiger7_88]

1 hour ago, ctrcat said:

It only takes a spark to get a fire going, and soon all those around will warm up in its glowing.

That's not a fire.

It's a fever.

From a bad case of the disease Delusiona.

[Frizzy350]

On 8/12/2016 at 0:37 PM, Hammerin'Cameron1 said:

I can't get over how anti-Hardy this place is

You guys do realize by saying "we don't want this elite DE"

You really are saying we don't want to win the Super Bowl, getting there is fine .. as if we will even be as good as we were last year. If you arent improving you are getting worse, and our D is clearly getting worse if you don't sign Hardy which is clearly why we are

You dont cut your best CB, draft 3 rookie CB's, draft a rookie DT, and say, TIME TO WIN A RING

No .. there is a clear plan behind all of this and the plan is that we will sneak an ALL PRO DE on our roster right before week 1

Going "all-in" for a superbowl rarely works.  Be the Patriots / Steelers: draft talented players, keep your cap under control, develop capable backups and be a contender every year.

[uncfan888]

32 minutes ago, top dawg said:

The delusion is not one-sided. Just saying.

Et tu, top Dawg? 

I'm pretty sure that most of us would take hardy on the team, but the delusion lies in the fact that some think it will happen. It will never happen 

[ctrcat]

19 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Yet another silly little person who thinks that DG spends 1st round picks on NEED.

And, amazingly enough, DG didn't pick a DE in either the 2015 or 2016 drafts.  Absolutely ODD for a team so desperate for DEs as you say.  Obviously, the General Manager disagrees with you.

Says the person who only days ago said he hoped DG was scouring the country for DE depth.  You either disagree with DG yourself or can't even keep track of what you believe.

[ctrcat]

11 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Et tu, top Dawg? 

I'm pretty sure that most of us would take hardy on the team, but the delusion lies in the fact that some think it will happen. It will never happen 

I've said repeatedly it's unlikely but no one knows what an 80 year old with health issues who has just been screwed by his peers that he believed respected him will do.  Write JR and try to be part of the solution.  The only people that want to see it less than those here that don't want it are the fans of the other 31 that would poop their pants.

[tiger7_88]

10 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

Says the person who only days ago said he hoped DG was scouring the country for DE depth.  You either disagree with DG yourself or can't even keep track of what you believe.

You seem to be confused at the difference between then (the past) and now (the future).

And I guarantee you, no matter the NEED, if there isn't a DE with a 1st round grade sitting when we pick in the 1st round in 2017, DG will pick another remaining position that DOES have a player available with a 1st round grade.  Hell, it might even be another LB or WR.

Then guys like you will proceed to go bat-poo crazy yet again, because y'all never learn.

[top dawg]

27 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Et tu, top Dawg? 

I'm pretty sure that most of us would take hardy on the team, but the delusion lies in the fact that some think it will happen. It will never happen 

No big deal. My first post in this thread stated that the old man will never let it happen. For me, the argument was always a philosophical one.

[CRA]

1 hour ago, rippadonn said:

If he was on THAT team would the defense have been better against Manning and perhaps have changed the tone of the game? Like Von Miller?

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Again....no, Hardy wouldn't have outperformed Ealy in that game.  Defense wasn't a problem.  We weren't missing better DE play.

what we could of used vs Denver was better RT or RB play

[ctrcat]

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

You seem to be confused at the difference between then (the past) and now (the future).

And I guarantee you, no matter the NEED, if there isn't a DE with a 1st round grade sitting when we pick in the 1st round in 2017, DG will pick another remaining position that DOES have a player available with a 1st round grade.  Hell, it might even be another LB or WR.

Then guys like you will proceed to go bat-poo crazy yet again, because y'all never learn.

You're talking in circles.  Obviously there's no sane reason for DG to not sign a guy who was a good teammate that will help us immensely at a position of immediate need for cheap at this point.  At this point it's simply a matter of JR's willingness to put up with the uninformed, phony, and/or Panther hater backlash in exchange for propelling our Super Bowl odds into practical inevitability.

[uncfan888]

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

No big deal. My first post in this thread stated that the old man will never let it happen. For me, the argument was always a philosophical one.

Jerry Richardson crying on stage was a direct result of Hardy's actions. That's the reason it'll never happen 

[tiger7_88]

3 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Jerry Richardson crying on stage was a direct result of Hardy's actions. That's the reason it'll never happen 

Arguing against Hardy fanboyz is much akin to burning ants with a magnifying glass.

[ctrcat]

40 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Jerry Richardson crying on stage was a direct result of Hardy's actions. That's the reason it'll never happen 

Really?  Did he cry in May?  July at the kangaroo court?  August in BOA while cheering on #76?  September in Tampa?  Just a hunch but it'd say Atlantic City elevator video ensuring the Panthers wouldn't win Super Bowl 49 had something to do with it.

21 games and a thrown out case later, longer than any rapist, murderer, officer assaulting thug, etc., in league history, 4 of which were on another team which would have made bringing him back last year far less appealing or realistic (not to mention he was signed in March), here we are, coincidentally with huge question marks at DE.  I'm not optimistic but if it doesn't happen JR deserves to be called out on it.  We'll see.

[uncfan888]

9 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

Really?  Did he cry in May?  July at the kangaroo court?  August in BOA while cheering on #76?  September in Tampa?  Just a hunch but it'd say Atlantic City elevator video ensuring the Panthers wouldn't win Super Bowl 49 had something to do with it.

21 games later and a thrown out case later, longer than any rapist, murderer, officer assaulting thug, etc., in league history, 4 of which were on another team which would have made bringing him back last year far less appealing or realistic (not to mention he was signed in March), here we are, coincidentally with huge question marks at DE.  I'm not optimistic but if it doesn't happen JR deserves to be called out on it.  We'll see.

You're a lost cause.. There's no point in trying to make you be logical 

[Cj72]

I don't care whether they sign hardy or not but I really need to know when he became the best de to ever play the game. I mean I've seen claims in this thread that the panthers lost the last 2 super bowls because he didn't play and that they are pretty much guaranteed a win this year if they sign him. I know he was pretty good while here but I guess last sb he would have played rt and receiver in place of cotchery. 

One more thing, how bad was Dallas if they weren't even able to make the playoffs with the wonder de on the team?