Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Tolbert


CoastalCat

Recommended Posts

Was talking to a friend this morning about Mike Tolbert's lack of tangible stats (rushing yards, TD's, etc). Was trying to get across how much his intangibles (blocking and being a decoy) mean to this offense, especially at the goal line. 

Then, I came across this video. It's not Tolbert's touchdowns; it's all of Cam's rushing TD's. Keep your eyes on 35. If you're not from 6 to midnight for this season by the end, we'll give you your money back. Guaranteed (not a guarantee).

Jelly Bean for President 2016.

watch?v=di149E2PW9I 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=di149E2PW9I 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Tolbert, but he's a mediocre blocker, at best.  A majority of his blocking in that video was garbage.  I do agree with him being a good decoy though.  You have to account for him in those short yardage situations, and it's part of what makes our offense so good near the goal line.  There's just too many people to account for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your friend uses the same rationale for Tolbert that the media does for Cam.  Criticize him for plays he doesn't make, when in reality it's his skill set that moves the entire offense.  Tolbert, albeit in a smaller universe, provides that same flexibility.  Just tell your friend that defenses have honed in on stopping Tolbert at the expense of the rest of our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CoastalCat said:

Was talking to a friend this morning about Mike Tolbert's lack of tangible stats (rushing yards, TD's, etc). Was trying to get across how much his intangibles (blocking and being a decoy) mean to this offense, especially at the goal line. 

Then, I came across this video. It's not Tolbert's touchdowns; it's all of Cam's rushing TD's. Keep your eyes on 35. If you're not from 6 to midnight for this season by the end, we'll give you your money back. Guaranteed (not a guarantee).

Jelly Bean for President 2016.

watch?v=di149E2PW9I 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=di149E2PW9I 

Okay. I'm tired of people saying that Tolbert is mediocre or overrated. In 2014, we only lost 1 game that he played in during the regular season. Of the games he didn't play in, we only won one game.

What more do you need?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Okay. I'm tired of people saying that Tolbert is mediocre or overrated. In 2014, we only lost 1 game that he played in during the regular season. Of the games he didn't play in, we only won one game.

What more do you need?

the panthers won every game newton missed that season.

therefore, newton must be overrated.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nosuchthingasapanther said:

the panthers won every game newton missed that season.

therefore, newton must be overrated.

 

Newton misses two games....against the Buccaneers. That isn't an apples to apples comparison. 

Maybe try inserting a Mike Tolbert stat to disprove me?

#huddlesgonhuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nosuchthingasapanther said:

the panthers lost 8 games with newton under center.

he is overrated.

We aren't discussing Newton. Have you been drinking or are you attempting to troll a post that actually made an accurate point?

To your argument: Cam Newton scored 50 TD's and played in 17 wins last season when including the Post Season. Therefore, he is not overrated.

The past two seasons, we are 25-4 with Mike Tolbert starting. Therefore, he is underrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, nosuchthingasapanther said:

mike tolbert has been a starter in only 10 of those games.

and yes, i'm trolling you...simply because win/loss record is a retarded way of measuring wether someone is over/underrated.

With a large enough sample size you can argue there is cause and effect. I'm not really in the mood to research and find out the chance probability because of all the variables. 

Knowing what I know about 2014, we played better as a whole when Tolbert was in the game. His worth to the team can't be measured in statistics alone as everyone is aware that he is a leader and people on the team look to him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...