Hi.

[top dawg]

If only that were true. 

 

 

[top dawg]

15 hours ago, Razeyfingers said:

Shrug, Im not the one who cares what people think about me here, you are. 

You really don't know me if you actually think that I have a need for some type of approval from virtual strangers on the Internet. 

Let's get one thing straight. I come here to discuss the Carolina Panthers. That's my main objective for being here. Of course along the way,  relationships of some degree or another quite naturally develop. Inasmuch as I do have "friends" here, I only "care" about what those friends think of me. You, my friend, are not one of those people, and I doubt that you will ever be. I don't care if you care. I don't care what you think of me. All I really care about while being here is discussing the Panthers and perhaps cultivating thoughtful dialogue and relationships with those that care to in a respectful manner. I appreciate that aspect of being on the Huddle, and appreciate people who enjoy that same experience on the Panthers forum. You obviously are looking for something quite different, so as far as I'm concerned, you (and anyone like you) can kick rocks. Go to the tinderbox and smack forum and play like a good little kid.

[Razeyfingers]

6 hours ago, top dawg said:

You obviously are looking for something quite different, so as far as I'm concerned, you (and anyone like you) can kick rocks. Go to the tinderbox and smack forum and play like a good little kid.

 

Well, where are we here? Fallback argument 3 or 4 Im not sure. Let me take a second to gather some notes and figure it out for us.

 

 

Argument #1 Liberals do not discriminate to religions: 

Well, this was very wrong as you conceded already. Here's a confused person that declared himself as a liberal to justify what he says without accountability.

first silly mocking

On 7/29/2016 at 2:11 PM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

What the darn-diddily-doodily did you just say about me, you little witcharooney? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class at Springfield Bible College, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret mission trips in Capital City,. . . . 

Then he has an epiphany, all religion is regression? Christianity is regression? Im not sure youll have to ask him because I never mentioned anything about Christianity, nor being a Christian, nor would any of my statements identify me as such. Shrug, Im just speaking on logic and he got very mad. 

On 7/30/2016 at 7:41 AM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

yeah apparently the answer to the question is "infinite regress"

Argument #2 It is not correct to classify a group of liberals as silly libs:

Well, when I find more than one of one type of something doing something I classify that as plural. 

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/128851-hi/?do=findComment&comment=3820341

Floppin and NFL shield are both silly liberals for not being able to understand simple math and mocking it.

 

Argument #3 This belongs in the smack or tinderbox forums

I didnt initiate this discussion. I responded to people that are speaking to me after I responded to this very simply. 

On 7/29/2016 at 10:21 AM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Are any of y'all a bit bothered by the obvious religious trend by a lot of our players?. . .  it seems to me like a lot of panthers players are quoting the bible a lottttt on Twitter etc.. .  I'm kind of put off by it all. Full disclosure: I don't believe in God, I'm a liberal, but I'm also as big of a panther fan as any of y'all. Just curious if anyone else sees a trend. 

 

aaand here we are now

Argument #4 Top Top doesn't need approval from strangers on the internet.

Why didnt you let NFL Shield at Midfield finish his own argument then? Do you think of him as a child? Why did you step in and fail this out 4 arguments deep like you always do? Top I know youre not aware of this yet, but you have a mental disorder. You should not be allowed to own any weaponry of any kind. 

[top dawg]

2 hours ago, Razeyfingers said:

 

Well, where are we here? Fallback argument 3 or 4 Im not sure. Let me take a second to gather some notes and figure it out for us.

 

 

Argument #1 Liberals do not discriminate to religions: 

Well, this was very wrong as you conceded already. Here's a confused person that declared himself as a liberal to justify what he says without accountability.

first silly mocking

Then he has an epiphany, all religion is regression? Christianity is regression? Im not sure youll have to ask him because I never mentioned anything about Christianity, nor being a Christian, nor would any of my statements identify me as such. Shrug, Im just speaking on logic and he got very mad. 

 

Argument #2 It is not correct to classify a group of liberals as silly libs:

Well, when I find more than one of one type of something doing something I classify that as plural. 

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/128851-hi/?do=findComment&comment=3820341

Floppin and NFL shield are both silly liberals for not being able to understand simple math and mocking it.

 

Argument #3 This belongs in the smack or tinderbox forums

I didnt initiate this discussion. I responded to people that are speaking to me after I responded to this very simply. 

 

aaand here we are now

Argument #4 Top Top doesn't need approval from strangers on the internet.

Why didnt you let NFL Shield at Midfield finish his own argument then? Do you think of him as a child? Why did you step in and fail this out 4 arguments deep like you always do? Top I know youre not aware of this yet, but you have a mental disorder. You should not be allowed to own any weaponry of any kind. 

My only mental disorder is continuing to have discourse with you, so l am going to end it now. You are dead to me.

[Razeyfingers]

15 hours ago, top dawg said:

My only mental disorder is continuing to have discourse with you, so l am going to end it now. You are dead to me.

Well, if you get the urge to discuss it again Im sure the 6 who pie'd the discriminatory post will be happy to talk about it with you:

L-Towncat, uncfan888, Chaos, Floppin, Rodeo, and CatofWar along with the OP, nfl shield at midfield

They can now have their own "We come from nothing and we're nobodies!" argument in the tinderbox in their own little nobody thread for all the rest of the nobodies to care about. 

[Guild]

Well this thread got really weird.

[top dawg]

13 minutes ago, Guild said:

Well this thread got really weird.

I don't generally entertain weirdos, but I felt compelled. 

I must say that there is a certain amount of satisfaction from using the ignore function. In my estimation, it's vastly underrated.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

48 minutes ago, Guild said:

Well this thread got really weird.

 

[Guild]

Thanks for making it slightly more bearable.

[Adb6368]

Long time lurker, relatively new poster.

I would normally think of something sarcastic to say about the discussion in this thread but, rather unbelievably, I don't have anything that won't offend 50% of the posters on this board. So with that said, I'll introduce myself... I'm the guy that didn't get the memo that your Huddle Name should be a pun and/or unique statement about the panthers so I thought of the most dull 3 letters and 4 numbers variation I could think of. With high regret, I'm looking for instructions on how to change it. Am I completely overlooking this setting or is it not possible??? 

[hitman80]

Been a lurker for many years.  I rarely chime in because you all do enough arguing as is.

[Razeyfingers]

9 hours ago, top dawg said:

I don't generally entertain weirdos, but I felt compelled. 

Its weird for someone to respond when spoken to? You quoted me intending for me to me respond didnt you? Anyways you said this days ago.

 

On 8/2/2016 at 6:03 AM, top dawg said:

 Following someone around from thread to thread is child's play. I don't have the time nor the inclination to follow anyone around in real life, much less an Internet forum.

 

and you follow me around for several days. . . 

 

 

On 7/31/2016 at 7:06 PM, top dawg said:

I wholeheartedly reject the political appropriation of the term "liberal" and unenlightened persons' attempts to cast the term in a negative light. To me it's a political ploy and it's liberal use is for those who are more interested in shallow talking points than actual substantive discussion, and that's silly in my opinion (and it's also why relatively little gets done in the states' and nation's capitals while society is arguably on the downswing).

Taking people and referring to them as a liberal or a conservative doesn't say too much. People may swing one way about this issue, and another way about that issue. People within political parties are not monolithic, regardless of political games and narratives. 

I don't enjoy playing those games, and I guess that's why I don't go to the tenderbox. 

I try to think outside the box.

But, carry on. 

 

 

On 8/2/2016 at 6:03 AM, top dawg said:

As for losing an argument, that's ludicrous. You made the juvenile "silly libs" comment, and I pointed out how silly it is in light of the true meaning of the term "liberal" within the context of football players being allowed to praise God (or not) as they see fit, and then you battened down on stupidity.  Your "silly libs" comment is out of place literally (as it should not be in the Panthers forum), and on other levels. I pointed it out. It's simple (double entendre intended). 

All the other stuff about following you and scrutinizing your posts, and being an angry liberal (a step up from a "silly lib" I suppose) is nonsense. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 8/3/2016 at 9:23 AM, top dawg said:

My initial response to you was in reference to your "silly libs" comment. As for all the other stuff, it's absolutely inconsequential and nonsensical.

You're juvenile,  and you obviously have some esteem issues, being that you're the one on the Internet calling names, labeling, insulting people's education, and all after it was explained to you that you've taken someone else's comment way out of the intended context. My stars, what are you 12? 

By the way, your telling me that I am not as smart as I think I am makes me feel even smarter.

 

On 8/3/2016 at 9:37 PM, top dawg said:

If only that were true. 

 

 

 

On 8/4/2016 at 1:00 PM, top dawg said:

You really don't know me if you actually think that I have a need for some type of approval from virtual strangers on the Internet. 

Let's get one thing straight. I come here to discuss the Carolina Panthers. That's my main objective for being here. Of course along the way,  relationships of some degree or another quite naturally develop. Inasmuch as I do have "friends" here, I only "care" about what those friends think of me. You, my friend, are not one of those people, and I doubt that you will ever be. I don't care if you care. I don't care what you think of me. All I really care about while being here is discussing the Panthers and perhaps cultivating thoughtful dialogue and relationships with those that care to in a respectful manner. I appreciate that aspect of being on the Huddle, and appreciate people who enjoy that same experience on the Panthers forum. You obviously are looking for something quite different, so as far as I'm concerned, you (and anyone like you) can kick rocks. Go to the tinderbox and smack forum and play like a good little kid.

 

On 8/4/2016 at 10:06 PM, top dawg said:

My only mental disorder is continuing to have discourse with you, so l am going to end it now. You are dead to me.

 

I hope you get the help you need.

 

edit: silly libs :-P

[Razeyfingers]

19 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

 

You got broken in half by 5 words then hid and acted like a child for 5 pages. In the the history of the internet, no Atheist has lost a discussion so fast and so poorly. 

 

HAHAHAHAHA it took 5 words smh

[arbnranger]

@Jangler How you doin' ? 

Ha