Hi.

[Floppin]

1 hour ago, Razeyfingers said:

I just know that one of these days youre gonna finish a useful thought that matters. lol, til then, you got handled again Georgetown.

Your white flag is starting to get a little thread bare.

[top dawg]

1 hour ago, Razeyfingers said:

Thanks but I was the one responding not the one inquiring. 

 

And its a shame that the term "liberal" more often this day means the exact opposite of what you said. In this very thread a liberal was belittling Christianity. 

I wholeheartedly reject the political appropriation of the term "liberal" and unenlightened persons' attempts to cast the term in a negative light. To me it's a political ploy and it's liberal use is for those who are more interested in shallow talking points than actual substantive discussion, and that's silly in my opinion (and it's also why relatively little gets done in the states' and nation's capitals while society is arguably on the downswing).

Taking people and referring to them as a liberal or a conservative doesn't say too much. People may swing one way about this issue, and another way about that issue. People within political parties are not monolithic, regardless of political games and narratives. 

I don't enjoy playing those games, and I guess that's why I don't go to the tenderbox. 

I try to think outside the box.

But, carry on. 

[Shufdog]

Holy poo!! This thread is still here?? Come on mods... move it!!

[Razeyfingers]

On 7/31/2016 at 6:55 PM, Floppin said:

Your white flag is starting to get a little thread bare.

whatever that means

On 7/31/2016 at 7:06 PM, top dawg said:

carry on. 

 

If you lose one portion of your argument you fall back to another argument and then another. When that fails you post a random summation of something that I didnt initiate nor cared about in the first place. I would love to learn something from you guys, but you never can stay on point or topic. 

 

I know Top Top, Floppin, and CSX all want to scrutinize my posts from thread to thread like we're playing a game here. I would like to learn something from you guys even with all the ganging up the angry liberals do around here. I hope one day you guys make that happen. 

[Razeyfingers]

On 7/29/2016 at 2:35 AM, Jangler said:

Are you new? Introduce yourself. Stop lurking and join up, and you can be stupid, no judgment here.

Go Panthers!!

Loved it, 5 starred it. 

[top dawg]

5 hours ago, Razeyfingers said:

whatever that means

 

If you lose one portion of your argument you fall back to another argument and then another. When that fails you post a random summation of something that I didnt initiate nor cared about in the first place. I would love to learn something from you guys, but you never can stay on point or topic. 

 

I know Top Top, Floppin, and CSX all want to scrutinize my posts from thread to thread like we're playing a game here. I would like to learn something from you guys even with all the ganging up the angry liberals do around here. I hope one day you guys make that happen. 

 Following someone around from thread to thread is child's play. I don't have the time nor the inclination to follow anyone around in real life, much less an Internet forum. 

As for losing an argument, that's ludicrous. You made the juvenile "silly libs" comment, and I pointed out how silly it is in light of the true meaning of the term "liberal" within the context of football players being allowed to praise God (or not) as they see fit, and then you battened down on stupidity.  Your "silly libs" comment is out of place literally (as it should not be in the Panthers forum), and on other levels. I pointed it out. It's simple (double entendre intended). 

All the other stuff about following you and scrutinizing your posts, and being an angry liberal (a step up from a "silly lib" I suppose) is nonsense. 

 

 

 

 

 

[cookinwithgas]

How's Janglers latest attempt to meet women on the internet going?

[Carl Spackler]

we need all black helmets and logo on mid field

sorry if this offend's

[Razeyfingers]

On 8/2/2016 at 6:03 AM, top dawg said:

As for losing an argument, that's ludicrous. You made the juvenile "silly libs" comment, and I pointed out how silly it is in light of the true meaning of the term "liberal" within the context of football players being allowed to praise God (or not) as they see fit, and then you battened down on stupidity.  Your "silly libs" comment is out of place literally (as it should not be in the Panthers forum), and on other levels. I pointed it out. It's simple (double entendre intended). 

All the other stuff about following you and scrutinizing your posts, and being an angry liberal (a step up from a "silly lib" I suppose) is nonsense. 

I appreciate youre attempt to look intelligent again. . . by calling people "stupid". LoL

 

This guy here is a liberal and said

 

On 7/29/2016 at 10:21 AM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Are any of y'all a bit bothered by the obvious religious trend by a lot of our players? . . . it seems to me like a lot of panthers players are quoting the bible a lottttt on Twitter . . I'm kind of put off by it all. Full disclosure: I don't believe in God, I'm a liberal.

 

You said liberals freely accept all religions? Praise god as they see fit you said? but this guy is bothered by it so much that he must know why athletes post about it on twitter. I responded but you jumped in to his defense like all liberals try to gang up and do. He tried to finish his own defense and couldnt. Floppin's ten cent Georgetowne education and sarcasm couldnt help him. Now you come in to tell us all here that liberals are freely accepting of all religions and not bothered by it. Right after this guy said

 

 

Quote

 

What the darn-diddily-doodily did you just say about me, you little witcharooney? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class at Springfield Bible College, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret mission trips in Capital City, and I have over 300 confirmed baptisms. I am trained in the Old Testament and I’m the top converter in the entire church mission group. You are nothing to me but just another heathen. I will cast your sins out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before in Heaven, mark my diddily-iddilly words. You think you can get away with saying that blasphemy to me over the Internet? Think again, friendarino. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of evangelists across Springfield and your IP is being traced by God right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggorino. The storm that wipes out the diddily little thing you call your life of sin. You’re going to Church, kiddily-widdily. Jesus can be anywhere, anytime, and he can turn you to the Gospel in over infinity ways, and that’s just with his bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in preaching to nonbelievers, but I have access to the entire dang- diddily Bible collection of the Springfield Bible College and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your sins away off the face of the continent, you diddily-doo satan-worshipper. If only you could have known what holy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you from the Heavens, maybe you would have held your darn-diddily-fundgearoo tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re clean of all your sins, you widdillo-skiddily neighborino. I will sing hymns of praise all over you and you will drown in the love of Christ. You’re farn-foodily- flank-fiddily reborn, kiddo-diddily.

 PIE this

 

 

 

So his comment was silly. As always you're caught up in trying to look right again, Top top. Youre egotistical and dumb. Youre no where near as smart as you think you are.

[Jangler]

This thread needs an enema

 

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

poor little razeyfingers still thinks i wrote that shitpost about athletes expressing their religion

literally everybody in this topic but him understands that that was copied verbatim from another thread as a joke

oh and that ned flanders copypasta.  i actually wish i had come up with that because it's hilarious.

[top dawg]

2 hours ago, Razeyfingers said:

 Youre egotistical and dumb. Youre no where near as smart as you think you are.

My initial response to you was in reference to your "silly libs" comment. As for all the other stuff, it's absolutely inconsequential and nonsensical.

You're juvenile,  and you obviously have some esteem issues, being that you're the one on the Internet calling names, labeling, insulting people's education, and all after it was explained to you that you've taken someone else's comment way out of the intended context. My stars, what are you 12? 

By the way, your telling me that I am not as smart as I think I am makes me feel even smarter.

[DelvinFunjamin]

I caved and finally joined thanks to this thread. Long time lurker, so I'll try and contribute a bit!

[Razeyfingers]

11 hours ago, top dawg said:

You're juvenile,  and you obviously have some esteem issues, being that you're the one on the Internet calling names, labeling, insulting people's education, and all after it was explained to you that you've taken someone else's comment way out of the intended context. My stars, what are you 12? 

Shrug, Im not the one who cares what people think about me here, you are.