Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Two Pricing Tiers this year


CosmoGirl

Recommended Posts

Got an email for PSL Owners this morning from Danny Morrison. In it, he states that there will be two Pricing Tiers this year - one for Preseason and one for Regular Season but the overall price is the same as what was sent out in the invoices.  

While this is nice that Preseason are "technically" less expensive, I think they should have told us upfront about this and what the breakdown of the pricing is so those of us selling tickets would be able to determine how much to sell them for. For example, I based my asking price on $xxxx/10 and sold three games using that price and now I find that the face value is more. And still don't know what the actual face value is. 

What about people who purchased when they went on-sale to the public? Did they pay "old" prices or "new"?

Here's the email excerpt...

  • Ticket Pricing : As a result of annual fan surveys, a new pricing structure has been adopted to better reflect the market value of preseason games compared to regular season games. While the total cost will be the same as we shared with you earlier this year, when you receive your season tickets you will notice two-tiered pricing that reflects lower prices on preseason tickets and higher prices for regular season games.

 

Edit update:  Here's what I put together based on available non-resale ticket prices

  

Panthers Season Tix.docx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't sell my tickets so that's not an issue for me.  I'm still paying the same price when amortized over 10 games so discounting the preseason games and raising the cost of the regular season games is just a shell game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, @RoaringRiot. When I lived in NC, I never sold tickets and went to every home game. 

I sell most of the games I cannot attend to my friends at or near face value. So the games I've already sold are technically below face and then you know how it goes with not getting much for preseason as it already was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This stinks for me since I always take a friend with me to the games. Now I have to charge them more. I usually sell my preseason tickets just for what I can get out them anyway. Now that will be even lower. If they are going to drop prices on preseason tickets,  leave the regular season tickets alone. Oh, but then they would be LOSING money! Can't do that! No, no, no!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I can find on Ticketmaster with limited availability of face value tickets, the lower endzones are $70 for preseason and $142 for regular season. So those people would expect that each game would be $127.60 each. That's almost half price for preseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bleedsgreenandgold said:

How are they enabling people to resale their tickets? The price of the season tickets was the same no matter what they put on the ticket.

They made the face value of the regular season tickets higher.  They skewed the price towards the sellable regarding season tickets in response to the survey for the exact reason of selling them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, csx said:

They made the face value of the regular season tickets higher.  They skewed the price towards the sellable regarding season tickets in response to the survey for the exact reason of selling them.

My 4 tickets between the 2 preseason games will be about $100 total cheaper. That $100 is going to be spread over 16 tickets (over 8 games). Pretty much minimal to anyone buying or selling them.

 

Alot of fuss about nothing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just admit that you don’t follow all the draft discussions on here. If draft results were so random, how come some teams tend to be perennial losers like us and some teams are perennial winners and it all starts with the draft? It’s almost comical these type of stupid responses. Oh, why aren’t you the GM? Gee I wonder since I work in a completely different field. How about you give us some examples of where the huddle consensus drafting was worse than our drafting from 2018 to 2025? I know I’ve given a ton of examples and you just shoot this generic poo of oh you couldn’t possibly done better as an armchair GM. Why don’t you dispute any of my examples? Let’s go to Brooks. I wanted Frazier at C because I still feel like that’s a hole. Other Huddlers mentioned DeJean at CB. Here’s why many of us didn’t want Brooks because 1) he might not play due to tearing his ACL late in the college season, 2) any scout/GM worth their salt would know that the 2025 RB draft class was loaded and 3) trading up multiple picks knowing 1 and 2 seems silly. Heck, after the draft, pretty clear that day 3 was where the RB value was. The huddle was right on Brooks and at most, we’ll get 2 years of Brooks while Hubbard is still under contract. If you know so much about the underlying machinations of the draft, you should be able to dispute the actual examples and how the huddle’s picks were just plain lucky and how Dan, Scott and Marty’s picks were just unlucky. Pulling the why aren’t you an NFL GM is a much repeated response when an actual reasoned response isn’t possible. Our drafting hasn’t been unlucky the past 7 drafts, it’s just been bad with lost of idiotic moves that were far worse than the huddle consensus.
    • I got y’all https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/04/09073220/2025-Beast-v02.pdf Th3!Be@$T!#2025
    • 100%!! Last year we focused completely on offense, and it made leaps, especially when Bryce settled in for the 2nd half of the season. We kept all those players and improved our RB stable this free agency! This year we focused almost entirely on D, specifically our run D. I expect it to jump to at least average, which would be awesome considering they are starting at dead frikin last. Our draft class from last year, however, doesn't exactly make me tingle. I know, I know..."traded away our first round pick, give them time to develop", but still. The 1 gem was Coker, a UDFA who I really like, but he ain't exactly Randy Moss. We have to do better! We can't afford to only build via Free agency.
×
×
  • Create New...