Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KD to the Warriors

setzer2030

By setzer2030,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Daddy_Uncle Veteran

Daddy_Uncle

Posted
Posted

The Warriors may not lose a game next season. Not like it really matters. The Hornets will never be able to compete or be anything other than mediocre. The NBA is going to start losing fans and viewers fast if one or 2 teams are allowed to keep stacking their rosters like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Manos Newbie

Manos

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

The Warriors may not lose a game next season. Not like it really matters. The Hornets will never be able to compete or be anything other than mediocre. The NBA is going to start losing fans and viewers fast if one or 2 teams are allowed to keep stacking their rosters like this.

Well slight bright side is that Curry's deal will be up next year and he will be looking at a roughly 18 million dollar increase in salary so they are going to have to lose almost the entire bench to keep him. So while KD, Curry, Green and Klay are great the 4 of them with 11 scrubs aren't winning anything(I hope).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherKing1983 Newbie

PantherKing1983

Posted
Posted

The NBA is becoming a 6 team league maybe it was always a 6 team league but there are 30 teams in the NBA now and with the talent not evenly dispersed its gonna hurt the product in the long run its a freaking 82 game season of hopelessness for over 20 teams and fan bases.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Guest Guest

Guest Guest Guest

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

The Warriors may not lose a game next season. Not like it really matters. The Hornets will never be able to compete or be anything other than mediocre. The NBA is going to start losing fans and viewers fast if one or 2 teams are allowed to keep stacking their rosters like this.

The warriors were terrible for a long time, they drafted the right players and became a powerhouse. The hornets had good teams in the 90's but were never a threat to win the title, did you stop watching then? The NBA has never had parity why cry about it now. The NBA didn't lose fans in the 80's (Lakers / Celtics / Pistons) , 90's (Bulls), 00's (Lakers / Spurs), 10's (Lebron, Warriors) why would the NBA lose fans. Powerhouse teams improves the ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Guest Guest Guest said:

The warriors were terrible for a long time, they drafted the right players and became a powerhouse. The hornets had good teams in the 90's but were never a threat to win the title, did you stop watching then? The NBA has never had parity why cry about it now. The NBA didn't lose fans in the 80's (Lakers / Celtics / Pistons) , 90's (Bulls), 00's (Lakers / Spurs), 10's (Lebron, Warriors) why would the NBA lose fans. Powerhouse teams improves the ratings.

People are getting tired of it almost nobody I know watches the NBA or keeps up with it. People from Carolina all the way to California. It has its fans but people get tired of seeing one or two powerhouse teams and the early 2000s all the way back at least had some parity. A lot more than now for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Guest

Guest Guest

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, OldNorthPowell said:

People are getting tired of it almost nobody I know watches the NBA or keeps up with it. People from Carolina all the way to California. It has its fans but people get tired of seeing one or two powerhouse teams and the early 2000s all the way back at least had some parity. A lot more than now for sure.

This isn't new the bulls dominated the league in the 90's and the NBA was as popular as ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Guest Guest said:

This isn't new the bulls dominated the league in the 90's and the NBA was as popular as ever

They did but plenty of teams competed against them at least. Now days the NBA is boring and everyone knows who is going to win and other teams did win championships during the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Guest

Guest Guest

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, OldNorthPowell said:

They did but plenty of teams competed against them at least. Now days the NBA is boring and everyone knows who is going to win and other teams did win championships during the 90s.

They competed and lost. The same way the spurs, clippers, cavs will compete against the GS warriors. The Bulls had a monopoly over the NBA, it took MJ retiring for another team to win

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Guest Guest said:

They competed and lost. The same way the spurs, clippers, cavs will compete against the GS warriors. The Bulls had a monopoly over the NBA, it took MJ retiring for another team to win

Other teams won in the 90s and other teams were better than the teams competing against GSW now. It is boring and many people feel the same way I do. I will take the 90s and 80s over now days any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Guest

Guest Guest

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

other teams did win championships during the 90s.

Pistons before the bulls became a great team, Houston Rockets (Jordan Retirement / Rusty MJ loses to Orlando), Spurs (MJ Retirement). Once again nothing has changed. I know that the hornets aren't winning the championship but that is not going to stop me from watching them this season and The GS Warriors will be must see tv can't wait tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Manos Newbie

Manos

Posted
Posted

Honestly KD to the Warriors doesn't make me favor them over a LeBron lead Cavs. LeBron has consistently made KD his bitch so no reason that should change. Kyrie eats Steph alive and Thompson and Love showed they dominate the Warriors down low(especially if they lose Ezeli and Bogut) so the only positive the Warriors have is Klay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Guest Guest said:

Pistons before the bulls became a great team, Houston Rockets (Jordan Retirement / Rusty MJ loses to Orlando), Spurs (MJ Retirement). Once again nothing has changed. I know that the hornets aren't winning the championship but that is not going to stop me from watching them this season and The GS Warriors will be must see tv can't wait tbh.

Sadly it will for me but to each his own. The NBA is becoming garbage. :+(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
    • TD alt
      I'm Sold on Drew Allar

      By TD alt · Posted

      FIFY
    • TD alt
      The Tank is on?

      By TD alt · Posted

      Logjam, indeed! Makes me nervous.
×
×
  • Create New...