Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the plan at Center?

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
Posted

Now that Big Al is off to Indy the Hornets have a huge need for a starting center. Unless the team is comfortable with Zeller (god I hope not) they have to make a move. What do you think the plan is? Throw a ton of money at Dwight and hope coaches can sway him to come play in Charlotte? Is there something we all don't know about the Sacramento trade? Cho has to be up to something. The Hornets need to lock up a starting big man before worrying about a backup Pg or Marvin Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I think it's Howard time.  He wanted to get traded here last season.   It could blow up for us but could work out.  It may be our only chance honestly and I just think he'll be better in a smaller market like he was down in Orlando. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted
Just now, Zaximus said:

I think it's Howard time.  He wanted to get traded here last season.   It could blow up for us but could work out.  It may be our only chance honestly and I just think he'll be better in a smaller market like he was down in Orlando. 

I second this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

Contract year for Cody. This is the first year he's going to be training as a full time center as opposed to a stretch four (which he never was going to be in the first place.)

I still think pieces will be moved around to address the center position but Cody was a top five pick, so I'm fine with seeing what he can do full time. Obviously he has limitations, but Dwight isn't the one size fits all solution here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, cbarrier90 said:

Contract year for Cody. This is the first year he's going to be training as a full time center as opposed to a stretch four (which he never was going to be in the first place.)

I still think pieces will be moved around to address the center position but Cody was a top five pick, so I'm fine with seeing what he can do full time. Obviously he has limitations, but Dwight isn't the one size fits all solution here.

lol if Cody is our full time center we may as well give up next season.  Dude is soft as tissue and is a backup off the bench at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, cbarrier90 said:

Contract year for Cody. This is the first year he's going to be training as a full time center as opposed to a stretch four (which he never was going to be in the first place.)

I still think pieces will be moved around to address the center position but Cody was a top five pick, so I'm fine with seeing what he can do full time. Obviously he has limitations, but Dwight isn't the one size fits all solution here.

Howard plays defense and can score with his physicality but he does have his short comings (free throws). Zeller is no center in the NBA and will get bullied in the paint a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

lol if Cody is our full time center we may as well give up next season.  Dude is soft as tissue and is a backup off the bench at best.

We won 48 games with Al Jefferson starting half the season. How is anything else NOT an improvement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

I'm really on the fence here. We can't afford Howard if we sign Marvin, right? I would rather have (regular season) Marvin.

No we can't. And even if he renounced him or he signed elsewhere, we'd have about $19 million, give or take. Still may not be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
  • Author
Posted

With MKG back on the court i'm not that worried about losing Marvin. We need a rim protector in the middle. Starting Frank at the 4 with Dwight at the 5 is better than Marvin and Cody imo, or really Marvin and any other Big we could afford after signing Mavin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNorthPowell Proficient

OldNorthPowell

Posted
Posted

Sadly Hornets fans forgot the Williams in year one of his contract that did nothing for the team because he was content. They also forget how soft Zeller is in the post. Signing Williams will give us 3 true PFs and no real Center outside of Hawes which is scary. Other teams will go off on us in the paint as if we play no defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, cbarrier90 said:

We won 48 games with Al Jefferson starting half the season. How is anything else NOT an improvement?

Meh, even off bench, he was putting a lot of minutes in.  Zeller has too many 5-10 point games to be a starter, maybe if his defense was good it could balance, but, it's bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...