Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are we featuring Stewart for a reason?

Blitz

By Blitz,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

I like both backs...Stewart looked awesome yesterday. Someone was just asking if we're featuring him for a reason...I simply posed a potential one.

Sell high...buy low. I'm just saying.

they're grooming stewart to be the load carrying power back they've not had since davis.

you don't invest the time and energy they have in a player just to give him away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guild Collaborator

Guild

Posted
Posted

can we afford both of them after their Rookie contracts are up?

Looks like the San Diego dilemma is coming(LT/Turner), and we have other needs. If we could get a top 15 pick this coming draft?

In theory yes we can. The question is how much money will D-Will want after his rookie contract is up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

I think that the rotation of DWill and Stewart is one of the things we can honestly say is being handled perfectly. I wouldn't change it a bit.

And this isn't an LT/Turner/Sproles deal. Both are getting the chance to shine and it looks like they really do view themselves as a two-headed monster. They both genuinely seem interested in giving the other guy every chance to be the star. That's not something that ever happened in San Diego.

Turner was a back-up, wayyyy back. Stewart is more like a boxer's left cross (jab, jab, jab, left cross, left cross, right uppercut). He's part of the attack, not just someone to hold the fort while DWill catches his breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted

Well, if they wanted to extend DWill to a fat contract, next season would be the time to do it, assuming there is not going to be a cap for that one season. They could give him a huge signing bonus, and a huge salary for that season, thus giving him a ton of guaranteed money, and then make the remainder of the years on the deal more back to normal. Everybody wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Well, if they wanted to extend DWill to a fat contract, next season would be the time to do it, assuming there is not going to be a cap for that one season. They could give him a huge signing bonus, and a huge salary for that season, thus giving him a ton of guaranteed money, and then make the remainder of the years on the deal more back to normal. Everybody wins.

I love DWill....but in today's NFL no RB is worth a fat contract. Too many RBs can get the job done....look at how many teams have mulitple threats at that position. Keep DWill if he wants to stay for some decent money which he deserves.....they shouldn't give him a fat deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
guyinchesapeake Newbie

guyinchesapeake

Posted
Posted

I like that they're using Stewart. We have 2 quality RBs, use them. Throw to them as well. I liked that they were thrown to in the flats against Atlanta, I'd like to see some screen passes as well to keep the defense 'more honest'. If we can get the TEs more involved (Jake, you reading this?), we might be able to save on some of the wear and tear Smitty and Moose are receiving, and turn them loose for real home run balls!

Use whoever gets the job done. Stew did well yesterday, as did D-Lo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...